When does the Yzerplan start getting criticized?

Lazlo Hollyfeld

The jersey ad still sucks
Mar 4, 2004
28,667
27,158
The team and the roster have seemingly spun their wheels (pun intended) for a bit now.

Have you already criticized it?

Or is making the playoffs next season critical?

Or does Yzerman have a longer leash due to his reputation?
It's not just about his rep. It's that he was handed a dumpster fire from Holland, got no help in the draft, and the moves he's been making have for the most part been good.
 

Bank Shot

Registered User
Jan 18, 2006
11,417
7,049
Imo they need to take a step forward next year. Similar to Ottawa. They are making win-now moves so they should start winning now
It'll be tough to make any kind of sizable step forward IMO. They have lots of cash but the free agent crop next offseason is dismal. There are only like 4 players on the roster that could be considered quality pieces over the next 5 years.

They will have to hope other teams will be looking to unload youngish good pieces which may or may not happen.
 

Tatar Shots

Registered User
Feb 2, 2014
5,715
1,716
Anyone who wants to criticize the Yzerman rebuild should point out what he could have done differently that would have the team in a better spot. He can’t pull star talent out of thin air and he has drafted very well in the first round so far. He’s made a bunch of small moves that have worked out and improved the team and the future incrementally. Blaming Yzerman for lousy lottery luck is nonsensical
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
36,155
16,616
It'll be tough to make any kind of sizable step forward IMO. They have lots of cash but the free agent crop next offseason is dismal. There are only like 4 players on the roster that could be considered quality pieces over the next 5 years.

They will have to hope other teams will be looking to unload youngish good pieces which may or may not happen.
Sure, but we should expect that young players take a step forward. Even though there aren't any major UFAs doesn't mean there aren't smart ones to target
 
  • Like
Reactions: barbu

BudBundy

Registered User
May 16, 2005
5,804
7,623
When you take an absolutely horrible team and you want to turn it into a serious Stanley Cup contender, it typically takes longer than 4 years. I mean even if you draft a great D man, Centre, and Goalie, they are barely ready to contribute in 4 years. There are some quick turnarounds, but most fall short. In my opinion, to be a real cup contender you need two really good Centers, a number one and two D man and a good supporting cast. Not to mention a good starting goalie. That takes a lot of high draft picks plus a lot of luck to accumulate, and more than 4 years to marinate. So long as Yzerman is accumulating blue chip prospects at a solid rate and is leveraging his cap space for more assets, you shouldn’t be calling for his head because that’s the kind of progress you should be seeing.
 

Cursed Lemon

Registered Bruiser
Nov 10, 2011
11,353
5,843
Dey-Twah, MI
Anyone who wants to criticize the Yzerman rebuild should point out what he could have done differently that would have the team in a better spot. He can’t pull star talent out of thin air and he has drafted very well in the first round so far. He’s made a bunch of small moves that have worked out and improved the team and the future incrementally. Blaming Yzerman for lousy lottery luck is nonsensical

wHat aBoUt cHiArOt
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad