What is your all-time Starting 5?

Ivan13

Not posting anymore
May 3, 2011
26,141
7,095
Zagreb, Croatia
What's so funny? Because I have a different opinion than yours? Get the **** outta here with your dogmatism attitude.

KG was better because of what? Being less dominant over his career? Being a lesser defensive player? Vastly inferior longevity? A lesser offensive game? The only thing he might have over Duncan is his short peak.
 

Vamos Rafa

Registered User
Jan 11, 2010
18,385
1,546
Armenia, California
Like sjfan said, KG's peak was higher than Duncan's. And vastly inferior longevity? KG played 21 seasons. TD played 19. It depends on your definition of offensive. Duncan was the slightly better scorer but KG was the better passer. Duncan was an elite rim protector and a better defender in the post but KG, because of his athleticsm and a slender built for a PF, could guard the perimeter. If you take away team accomplishments, it's really a wash IMO but I just prefer KG's game.
 

Ivan13

Not posting anymore
May 3, 2011
26,141
7,095
Zagreb, Croatia
Tim Duncan was one of the best defensive players in his last NBA season, KG was a passanger ever since he left Boston. I don't see why he would get points for longevity because he played past his best before date.
 

Vamos Rafa

Registered User
Jan 11, 2010
18,385
1,546
Armenia, California
Consider the teams he played for in his last 4 years. I would've loved to see how KG would do under the guidance of Popovich. Yes, Duncan had the better longevity but you exaggerated the part where you said "vastly inferior." Duncan's playing style was always meant to last longer than KG's anyway. Bht peak-for-peak, I'd still take KG.
 

sjsharks92

Shark Tank Commander
Jun 9, 2014
2,523
303
Bay Area, California
Duncan was basically a superstar from day 1. His "peak" if you will began the minute he entered the league. Whereas for KG it took him 4-5 seasons to really become a superstar talent. Nothing wrong with that, that's the normal curve for star players but that's part of why Duncan's peak lasted longer. Additionally KG's peak really ended starting his 2nd season in Boston. By that point at age 32 he was only averaging 16/8/2/1/1. Nothing wrong with that, still exceptional numbers, but clearly not the same KG we had come to expect. Overall I'd say KG's peak lasted from the 98-99 season (age 22) until the 07-08 season (age 31). An incredible 10 year stretch.

However, as I noted, Duncan's was longer no doubt. I'd argue Duncan's peak was from 97-98 (age 21, rookie year) until 09-10 (age 33) a 13 year span. On top of that, Duncan's fall post-peak was nowhere near as extreme as KG's. Even in Duncan's final season he was still one of the 3 or 4 most important players on a Spurs team that was a very serious title contender. While KG was nothing more than a bench presence for the T-Wolves. Hell, even in Duncan's age 36 season he averaged 18/10/3 with 2.7 blocks per game! KG's career high was 2.2. And for reference KG in his age 36 season averaged 15/8/2/1/1. Nothing wrong with those numbers but not quite on par with Duncan.

I'll give you this though, KG was a more versatile player. He could defend the perimeter (although you didn't WANT to see him doing it) and he had that sweet 18-20 foot jumper from the top of the key. Duncan never developed a consistent shot from that range, he did his best work with his back to the basket. KG on the other hand had a slightly bigger arsenal to score from. That's why for the purposes of my starting 5 I picked KG, even though I do think Duncan was the better player.

I like both players a lot, so I'm not trying to put anyone down who picks KG. But in my opinion while KG is an all-time great, Duncan is still a tier above him.
 
Last edited:

x Tame Impala

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2011
27,656
12,221
Jordan and Orlando Shaq would've been really fun to watch. Maybe throw Rodman in their too. One of the more intimidating defensive lineups i can think of
 

Neutrinos

Registered User
Sep 23, 2016
8,621
3,614
Duncan played all four years at college, so it just makes sense that he would be NBA-ready when he hit the league

Garnett came straight out of high school, so his career trajectory also makes sense

And are people seriously arguing that Duncan was the superior defensive player?

Garnett was a 9x NBA All-Defensive First Team

They were both elite defensively
 
Last edited:

Neutrinos

Registered User
Sep 23, 2016
8,621
3,614
Tim Duncan was one of the best defensive players in his last NBA season, KG was a passanger ever since he left Boston. I don't see why he would get points for longevity because he played past his best before date.

By the time Garnett left Boston, he had played 47801 regular season minutes

For his entire career, Duncan played only 47368
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
40,817
17,204
Mulberry Street
Duncan was basically a superstar from day 1. His "peak" if you will began the minute he entered the league. Whereas for KG it took him 4-5 seasons to really become a superstar talent. Nothing wrong with that, that's the normal curve for star players but that's part of why Duncan's peak lasted longer. Additionally KG's peak really ended starting his 2nd season in Boston. By that point at age 32 he was only averaging 16/8/2/1/1. Nothing wrong with that, still exceptional numbers, but clearly not the same KG we had come to expect. Overall I'd say KG's peak lasted from the 98-99 season (age 22) until the 07-08 season (age 31). An incredible 10 year stretch.

However, as I noted, Duncan's was longer no doubt. I'd argue Duncan's peak was from 97-98 (age 21, rookie year) until 09-10 (age 33) a 13 year span. On top of that, Duncan's fall post-peak was nowhere near as extreme as KG's. Even in Duncan's final season he was still one of the 3 or 4 most important players on a Spurs team that was a very serious title contender. While KG was nothing more than a bench presence for the T-Wolves. Hell, even in Duncan's age 36 season he averaged 18/10/3 with 2.7 blocks per game! KG's career high was 2.2. And for reference KG in his age 36 season averaged 15/8/2/1/1. Nothing wrong with those numbers but not quite on par with Duncan.

I'll give you this though, KG was a more versatile player. He could defend the perimeter (although you didn't WANT to see him doing it) and he had that sweet 18-20 foot jumper from the top of the key. Duncan never developed a consistent shot from that range, he did his best work with his back to the basket. KG on the other hand had a slightly bigger arsenal to score from. That's why for the purposes of my starting 5 I picked KG, even though I do think Duncan was the better player.

I like both players a lot, so I'm not trying to put anyone down who picks KG. But in my opinion while KG is an all-time great, Duncan is still a tier above him.

KG's 2004 MVP year is one of the best seasons in NBA history and arguably a top 50 one in professional sports. What a treat it was to watch him that year.

By the time Garnett left Boston, he had played 47801 regular season minutes

For his entire career, Duncan played only 47368

KG had to carry his team from day one, fortunately for Duncan he had The Admiral, then Parker/Ginobli and then Leonard. He always had a good supporting cast - not using that as a negative, just for context.
 

ResilientBeast

Proud Member of the TTSAOA
Jul 1, 2012
13,903
3,558
Edmonton
PG - Chris Paul
SG - Kobe Bryant
SF - Scottie Pippen
PF - Tim Duncan
C - Shaquille O'Neal

Tried to use some less common names and build a more unique team, I'm more of a casual basketball fan anyway
 

sjsharks92

Shark Tank Commander
Jun 9, 2014
2,523
303
Bay Area, California
Duncan played all four years at college, so it just makes sense that he would be NBA-ready when he hit the league

Garnett came straight out of high school, so his career trajectory also makes sense

And are people seriously arguing that Duncan was the superior defensive player?

Garnett was a 9x NBA All-Defensive First Team

They were both elite defensively

Superior is far too strong of a word. Better though? Yes I'd feel very comfortable saying Duncan was a better defender than KG. That's not a knock on KG either.
 

sjsharks92

Shark Tank Commander
Jun 9, 2014
2,523
303
Bay Area, California
KG's 2004 MVP year is one of the best seasons in NBA history and arguably a top 50 one in professional sports. What a treat it was to watch him that year.

Agreed. It's a bit tough to cross-reference individual seasons with other sports but there's no doubt KG's MVP season was one of the best in NBA history. I'd say top 3 in the last 20 years up there with Shaq in 99-00 and Steph's 15-16.
 

VoluntaryDom

Formerly DominicBoltsFan / Ⓐ / ✞
Oct 31, 2016
23,285
5,532
Tampa FL
PG: Johnson
SG: Jordan
SF: James
PF: Garnett
C: Abdul-Jabbar

Bench:

PG: Stockton
SG: Bryant
SF: Durant
PF: Duncan
C: O'Neal


Done, use whatever lineups you like.
 

BGDDYKWL

Registered User
Jul 16, 2007
4,476
421
I think if we're talking primes I'd go Jordan, LeBron, Kobe, Duncan, Shaq. The size, skill, athleticism, defense, etc. would be very tough to top.
 

Porn*

Registered User
Mar 6, 2002
36,386
5
In your nightmares
Magic Johnson
Michael Jordan
Larry Bird
Tim Duncan
Bill Russel

6th: Lebron James
7th: Kobe Bryant
8th: Shaq
9th: Allen Iverson
 
Last edited:

VoluntaryDom

Formerly DominicBoltsFan / Ⓐ / ✞
Oct 31, 2016
23,285
5,532
Tampa FL
Like sjfan said, KG's peak was higher than Duncan's. And vastly inferior longevity? KG played 21 seasons. TD played 19. It depends on your definition of offensive. Duncan was the slightly better scorer but KG was the better passer. Duncan was an elite rim protector and a better defender in the post but KG, because of his athleticsm and a slender built for a PF, could guard the perimeter. If you take away team accomplishments, it's really a wash IMO but I just prefer KG's game.

This, except you are underrating KG's interior defense and scoring ability.

(Though as a Wolves fan I may be biased)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad