Inspired by the teams with a #1G, #1C, #1D thread, does HFBoards even have a consensus on what a #1D is?
Is it points (ala the Norris method)? Time vs top competition? Shot suppression? Corsi% GF%? Play time?
If a player excels in all of the above, would that make them a mere #1D or an elite #1D?
Is it points (ala the Norris method)? Time vs top competition? Shot suppression? Corsi% GF%? Play time?
If a player excels in all of the above, would that make them a mere #1D or an elite #1D?