Speculation: What is the best asset you part with to trade Bickell?

[Iridium128]

Anything that isn't Forsling, Pokka, Schmaltz, or the 16 1st.

 

[hockeydoug]

I'm not quite sure why he has been looked over as much as he has, but I think McNeill still has potential. IMO, he's our second best 'B' prospect, after Hartman.

Which teams want 4.5 million in salary, 4 million against the cap, and a depth wing "with upside" and only another year before he loses waiver exemption?

I like McNeill, but I'm going to be surprised if he's a reason they would be able to move Bickell.

 

[hockeydoug]

3.05 in capspace is worth more than it used to be.

Considering most of the 2nd round selection never even make 3 million dollars, let alone are worth that much in cap effectiveness over time, I think ridding a contract like Bickell's is worth alot more than a mid to late 2nd in 2017 for Chicago.

 

[zytz]

Really depends what comes back. But as stated, having his cap hit completely gone is worth a bit to this team

 

[Central PA Hawk Fan]

Really depends what comes back. But as stated, having his cap hit completely gone is worth a bit to this team

If I'm moving Bickell with actual assets, absolutely nothing comes back $ wise. Otherwise keep the assets and deal with 1 more year of Bickell's cap hit.

 

[Any Colour You Like]

I'd be OK with parting with anything below a second or Hartman (inclusive).

 

[Bubba88]

McNeill or less value, depending on whats coming back.