What is going on with these video reviews
- Thread starter hockeyguy1967
- Start date
KCC
Registered User
- Aug 15, 2007
- 18,447
- 9,429
I don't know. I was watching the Stars feed and it didn't look in to me. /shrug
The Tourist
Registered User
- Jul 11, 2008
- 7,822
- 3,854
On the Stars feed it showed that part of the puck was still on the line when it was cleared away.
- Oct 9, 2012
- 28,792
- 25,356
It's still touching the red that's why, you need clear definitive white between red line and puck which there isn't
Future GOAT
Registered User
- Apr 4, 2017
- 3,549
- 2,501
Hellraising Senator
Registered User
- Feb 15, 2017
- 719
- 760
Future GOAT
Registered User
- Apr 4, 2017
- 3,549
- 2,501
League still robbed McDavid of a legit point/goal.
So yeah sweet we won for sure. But we already won, and they took a point from McD.
McFlash97
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2017
- 7,469
- 6,509
Stfu , what part...lol, league is Bush league. What they have is a bunch of know it all , blowhards, who are too proud to get out of thier own way. That is a clear cut goal.
flamesforcup
Registered User
- Sep 5, 2017
- 3,026
- 3,539
Why is that pic shaded grey? Is it to make it look like it was in? From this pic it looks close.
Credit to @ManitobaKid for the pic
Credit to @ManitobaKid for the pic
LOFIN
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2011
- 14,079
- 19,157
I think hockey still has the "it must be in 100%" approach to these things. They really should adopt the NFL way of "there has to be 100% evidence to disprove it was a good play". This was a 50/50 situation, and it was ruled against. Should've gone the other way IMO.
koyvoo
Registered User
- Nov 8, 2014
- 17,271
- 17,059
The Tourist
Registered User
- Jul 11, 2008
- 7,822
- 3,854
It doesn't matter because the Oilers won but was McDavid even onside on that play? I'm too lazy to go back and look but if it had been determined it was in I know they would have looked at that next. He's so fast that it was hard to tell watching live but he did look offside.
Also should mention. From 2016 playoffs the Oilers have lost 15/17 video reviews. No joke.
Llamamoto
Nice Bison. Kind Bison. Yep.
- Sep 5, 2018
- 8,855
- 12,207
McRpro
Cont. without supporting.
The Kingslayer
Registered User
I thought he looked offside aswell lol. Imagine that goes in only to be waved off lol.
Llamamoto
Nice Bison. Kind Bison. Yep.
- Sep 5, 2018
- 8,855
- 12,207
Bettman's probably trying to make up for all of our lottery wins.
- Oct 9, 2012
- 28,792
- 25,356
It wasn't a terrible call or review, you cannot see it across with 100% certainty, I would say the same regardless of what team it was
flamesforcup
Registered User
- Sep 5, 2017
- 3,026
- 3,539
Why is this darkened down version being shown by the Oilers and their fans? The actual pic that i posted above seems like a no goal.
Spotty 2 Hotty
Special teams, special plays, special players
I don't understand why it's difficult to grasp the fact that it is supposed to be absolutely conclusive to overturn the no goal call on the ice.
Every image I have seen doesn't clearly show white between the puck and the red line. The images show that it still might be touching the red line, so even if they think it might be over, unless they're absolutely sure, the call stands. It's not like it matters anyway since the Oilers won.
Every image I have seen doesn't clearly show white between the puck and the red line. The images show that it still might be touching the red line, so even if they think it might be over, unless they're absolutely sure, the call stands. It's not like it matters anyway since the Oilers won.
This was not a 50/50 situation at all. This was a 100/0 situation. The only people who say it was not in were apparently people watching the Stars stream.
