PattyLafontaine
Registered User
- Apr 5, 2006
- 2,634
- 936
Only reason Nashville is in the East is because Detroit whined long enough to finally get their way, which is ass backwards because theyre closer to Western teams than Nashville is
I have always assumed the Lightning and Panthers are in the Atlantic because they know the Leafs fans as an example will always be at their games when Toronto plays them on the road. So that can happen at least 2x a year when the Leafs play in Tampa and Sunrise. This coming December I'm going to the Leafs and Lightning game in Tampa Bay since I will be on vacation in Orlando at that time, so it's only an hour drive between both cities.I understand Buffalo's division with
Boston
Detroit
Buffalo
Toronto
Ottawa and Montreal
but why did Tampa and Florida find their way there?
the NHL should have put Columbus and Pittsburgh with us over Tampa and Florida
Boston
Detroit
Buffalo
Toronto
Ottawa
Montreal
Pittsburgh
Columbus
------
Rangers
Islanders
Flyers
Devils
Capitals
Carolina
Tampa
Florida
meant to say isnt*Nashville is in the West.
Just for reference op, 16 most eastern teams in the east, the 15 most western teams in the west, the makes sense the way it is right now more than any other scenario. Yes Chi and Nsh are closer to the east right now but even if you move them, then you ask, well why are Minn and Stl in the west, they are closer to eastern teams like Chi and Nsh.
Its just an issue central time zone teams will have to deal with for the time being
As someone mentioned, to even up travel league wide, there should be a realignment that moves away from geographic conferences, but rather keeping geographic divisions (As much as possible, it's not like the NFL is perfect on this either). When we have 32 teams, we can do 4 divisions per conference, 2 conferences.
Wales Conference
West Div
San Jose
LA
Anaheim
Vegas
East Div
Boston
New York Rangers
Philadelphia
Washington
South Div
Nashville
Tampa Bay
Florida
Carolina
North Div
Winnipeg
Minnesota
Chicago
Detroit
Campbell Conference
West Div
Seattle
Vancouver
Edmonton
Calgary
East Div
New York Islanders
New Jersey Devils
Pittsburgh
CBJ
South Div
Arizona
Colorado
Dallas
St. Louis (if the Colts can play in the AFC South, the Blues can play in a South division)
North Div
Montreal
Toronto
Buffalo
Ottawa
Division winners are seeded 1-4, 4 wild cards
Why can't this model work? Not the exact alignment I'm showing, but the concept?
As someone mentioned, to even up travel league wide, there should be a realignment that moves away from geographic conferences, but rather keeping geographic divisions (As much as possible, it's not like the NFL is perfect on this either). When we have 32 teams, we can do 4 divisions per conference, 2 conferences.
Wales Conference
West Div
San Jose
LA
Anaheim
Vegas
East Div
Boston
New York Rangers
Philadelphia
Washington
South Div
Nashville
Tampa Bay
Florida
Carolina
North Div
Winnipeg
Minnesota
Chicago
Detroit
Campbell Conference
West Div
Seattle
Vancouver
Edmonton
Calgary
East Div
New York Islanders
New Jersey Devils
Pittsburgh
CBJ
South Div
Arizona
Colorado
Dallas
St. Louis (if the Colts can play in the AFC South, the Blues can play in a South division)
North Div
Montreal
Toronto
Buffalo
Ottawa
Division winners are seeded 1-4, 4 wild cards
Why can't this model work? Not the exact alignment I'm showing, but the concept?