Generational list.A kind of awful baker's dozen off the top of my head:
Halleujah, Leonard Cohen
Creep, Radiohead
Hotel California, The Eagles
Shout, Tears for Fears
Bitter Sweet Symphony, The Verve
Moon Dance, Van Morrison
Sweet Home, Alabama, Lynyrd Skynyrd
Goodbye Yellow Brick Road--Elton John
Putting "Hallowed Be Thy Name" has to be some kind of blasphemy, and it's not a bad song by any means, with Bruce's vocals being quite good, the lyrics emotional and impactful, and the musicianship also good, but I think the song is just lacking something. "Run to the Hills" is also pretty overplayed, but I think I'd rather listen to it than "Hallowed..." Of course, I don't think Iron Maiden ever topped the two Di'Anno albums.
I don't know of anyone who actually listens to Judas Priest extensively who really likes "Breaking the Law," but I feel like its their signature song, largely for image reasons.
"Dead Skin Mask" is just awful, but I think it was a live staple for some unfathomable reason.
I’m with you there. One of my favourite Stones’ songs. I always smile at the part:What’s up with the ’slander’ of ”(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction”? ”War Pigs” got mentioned as well? Man…
Part of the reason the Beatles end up on a lot of these lists is because they are overplayed.
It's like the song Lightning Crashes by Live.
Hearing it 10,000 times kind of skews your opinion.
Completely agreed. Something good becoming bad because it gets overplayed isn't a real thing, in my view (or if it is, only to a degree that never actually gets tested in practice, like if you literally got strapped to a chair and got pummeled with it 24/7 or something). It's more that the things that become tiresome on repeat listens because they're built around catchiness tend to be the things that become overplayed, but how easily they become tiresome is also kind of indicative of their warts/limited quality to begin with (or potentially the listener's total ignorance too, I guess). To me, the whole "I love this the first time but like it less and less on subsequent listens" thing isn't the expected norm, it's just indicative of getting swept up in hype and slowly realizing what something actually was all along over time when held under greater scrutiny.That could be the case with others, but personally if I love a song I don’t get tired of hearing it.
The fascination with the Beatles has always perplexed me, but to each their own.
Completely agreed. Something good becoming bad because it gets overplayed isn't a real thing, in my view (or if it is, only to a degree that never actually gets tested in practice, like if you literally got strapped to a chair and got pummeled with it 24/7 or something). It's more that the things that become tiresome on repeat listens because they're built around catchiness tend to be the things that become overplayed, but how easily they become tiresome is also kind of indicative of their warts/limited quality to begin with (or potentially the listener's total ignorance too, I guess). To me, the whole "I love this the first time but like it less and less on subsequent listens" thing isn't the expected norm, it's just indicative of getting swept up in hype and slowly realizing what something actually was all along over time when held under greater scrutiny.
That said, I absolutely love The Beatles-- I just think the big McCartney crowd-pleasing home run ballads are among their weaker material, personally. But they've done excellent things outside of those that more than make up for them.
Lots of hot takes on The Beatles in here...
Unless someone just heard the Beatles for the first time and hated them, it’s not exactly a hot take to dislike a band that was around 60 years ago...
Maybe it's my English again, but I thought a hot take was just a shallow and consciously provocative argument.
Cambridge: a piece of writing or speech, especially on the internet, giving someone's personal opinions about a topic, usually strong opinions that have not been carefully thought about and that many people are likely to disagree with
Maybe it's my English again, but I thought a hot take was just a shallow and consciously provocative argument.
Cambridge: a piece of writing or speech, especially on the internet, giving someone's personal opinions about a topic, usually strong opinions that have not been carefully thought about and that many people are likely to disagree with
I truly mean no offense, but this always happens when The Beatles get brought up around here. Save for my irreverent quip regarding Paul McCartney, what's been said about The Beatles that's so outrageous?
Welp, I certainly haven't been using that phrase correctly. I've been describing all my unpopular opinions as hot takes, even the ones that I've thought deeply about alot.Maybe it's my English again, but I thought a hot take was just a shallow and consciously provocative argument.
Cambridge: a piece of writing or speech, especially on the internet, giving someone's personal opinions about a topic, usually strong opinions that have not been carefully thought about and that many people are likely to disagree with
I truly mean no offense, but this always happens when The Beatles get brought up around here. Save for my irreverent quip regarding Paul McCartney, what's been said about The Beatles that's so outrageous?
easily most of the Beatles hits. They are the backstreet boys of the 60s.