GDT: We're Back! Boston Bruins vs. NY Rangers 1/19 @ 7pm NHLN, NESN, 98.5 The Sports Hub

[TCL40]

Pretty sure the puck was in that glove and it should be a goal but there is no video to prove it. Sucks.

 

[PlayMakers]

That's in. If they call that off then the rule is broken.

 

[FallsForItEveryYear]

It's in the net but it won't count

 

[plemur]

It was a goal, but it'll be called no goal.

 

[westernhome]

that puck was over the line

 

[Fopppa]

That had to be in. Right?

 

[Kaoz*]

Holy ****..

Nope! Thats a goal!

No it's not. You know the puck crossed the line but you can't see the puck cross the line.

That's no goal right there. Crazy save too. Thomas-esque.

 

[ranold26]

thats in.. but inconclusive.

 

[LouJersey]

Obvious goal.

 

[CamFan81]

Cmon the whole glove is in the net

 

[PahaMatti]

It's a goal but what can we do

 

[jasonbaz77*]

thats a goal but you cant see it so no goal

 

[KesselBuiltMyHotrod]

That's a goal but they can't overturn it.

 

[Whiskey Sam]

It is physically impossible for that not to be a goal. His entire ****ing glove is over the line!

 

[NinthSpoke06]

That is a goal. No doubt. But by rule they can't change the call on the ice.

 

[Gonzothe7thDman]

Puck in glove

Whole glove in net

But according to rule, no goal IMO.

 

[ode to fred]

Hope that's the last open net kreicji misses all year

 

[Confound]

No goal fml

 

[Bruinsforlife89]

Saw that call coming.

 

[Kelly23]

Confirmed how about inconclusive?????

 

[Scotto74]

bad explination but the right call

 

[lextune]

Ridiculous.

 

[FallsForItEveryYear]

The way he announced that was stupid

 

[Whiskey Sam]

That rule is idiotic. His entire ****ing glove is over the line. It cannot possibly not be a goal. **** having to see it.

 

[jasonbaz77*]

Confirmed how about inconclusive?????

Thats more accurate