dugman
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2008
- 743
- 726
For years, I’ve read posts that are cogent, thoughtful and interesting, but, for whatever reason, contain grammatical errors, misspellings, words that don’t mean what the authors think they mean, etc (I have done this myself, perhaps in this post).
Being a condescending jerk, my immediate impulse is to fire off a rebuttal, such as, “It’s not “pump the breaks“, it’s “brakes“, like the action you take to slow a vehicle.”
However, this tends to derail the thread and make people dislike you, so I propose we have this refuge for those of us want the satisfaction of venting and being condescending and jerky, but without some of the blowback. This way the other threads will be able to continue on course.
Examples:
It’s “would have”, not “would of”.
A contingency is a backup plan, a contingent is a group of people.
Myself is only appropriate when I am the subject of the sentence.
I may be the only one who thinks this is a good idea, of course, and I won’t be offended if any other condescending, jerky posters say so, but again, we’re just trying to help.
Being a condescending jerk, my immediate impulse is to fire off a rebuttal, such as, “It’s not “pump the breaks“, it’s “brakes“, like the action you take to slow a vehicle.”
However, this tends to derail the thread and make people dislike you, so I propose we have this refuge for those of us want the satisfaction of venting and being condescending and jerky, but without some of the blowback. This way the other threads will be able to continue on course.
Examples:
It’s “would have”, not “would of”.
A contingency is a backup plan, a contingent is a group of people.
Myself is only appropriate when I am the subject of the sentence.
I may be the only one who thinks this is a good idea, of course, and I won’t be offended if any other condescending, jerky posters say so, but again, we’re just trying to help.