Sportsnet panel saying the Canucks played pretty well despite 2 shots
You mean shouting at each other while they look at you, bewildered, isn’t gripping TV?I love the complete lack of chemistry on this espn panel
They didn’t play bad, until the 4 min ppSportsnet panel saying the Canucks played pretty well despite 2 shots
About $5k. Maybe even $10k.How much you guys think Subban gets paid for every appearance
DoubtfulDallas is licking their chops watching this game they’ll mow through either team
Just like there was no chance for a goal on Connor Brown's breakawayThere was no save…
He doesn't get paid per appearance he's a salaried analyst on a 3 year contract.How much you guys think Subban gets paid for every appearance
Yeah perhaps, though that breakaway save on Brown might've helped. There are worse things than not scoring on the PP, just ask the Canes...After blowing a double minor like that, I don't think so.
Petey is playing much better though. Mikheyev too but god bless those stone hands, not able to finishThis is embarrassing for Vancouver. On home ice, your stars should be ready to run through the wall and do anything to win. So far they look timid and rather unbothered. Biggest game for the team that could set the tone for them moving forward.
Okay, so what does that average out to per appearance? Ballpark?He doesn't get paid per appearance he's a salaried analyst on a 3 year contract.
Most guys get about a million a year as a commentator. They supply the wardrobe.How much you guys think Subban gets paid for every appearance
At least Silovs is giving them a chance.Are the Canucks hoping that Silovs makes a save and somehow it counts as a goal or something? What a terrible viewing experience this is!
I noticed that in another game last week. But i wasnt watching the game and wondered if the same player high sticked two guys drawing blood on bothUh, lol, TSN is on crack again. or maybe never stopped: View attachment 873671