CpatainCanuck
Registered User
- Sep 18, 2008
- 6,763
- 3,562
True. The Canucks controlled most of the game. Very few good scoring chances for the Preds until the last 10 minutes.The shot totals are not really indicative of the game.
True. The Canucks controlled most of the game. Very few good scoring chances for the Preds until the last 10 minutes.The shot totals are not really indicative of the game.
Recovering from the flu would be my guess.Jesus. that's a one in a hundred win. can't do that next game. what's our strategy?
Well-played and well-coached road game. We have them on their heels.
The game i watched was pretty even. And of course when ur up 2-0 ur gonna defend the lead not take unnecessary chances........The shot totals are not really indicative of the game.
Time to go read the Oiler's board meltdown over our unearned win with only 12 shots. I can imagine the takes already.
"PDO PDO rabble rabble rabble"Time to go read the Oiler's board meltdown over our unearned win with only 12 shots. I can imagine the takes already.
Yes it’s the conservation of greatness principle - they’ll be even better next gameThe forwards saved a lot of energy by only needing to take 12 shots to win the game.
Feels good to win on special teams for a changeThe PP is back baby.
That was the entire game story.
We go 2/3.
They go 0/5 (great PKing from us).
The dope thing about the playoffs is that one game doesn’t inform the next. Canucks won and it doesn’t matter nor indicative of what will happen on Sunday.
I aged about 57 years since the start of the third period.
it's also not sustainable to lose games and only allow 12 shots on goal so it evened out for usI mean, they wouldn’t be entirely wrong. Not sustainable to win games and only getting 12 shots on net
"PDO PDO rabble rabble rabble"