Mothra said:
75 Million???.....could that be an exaggeration on your part?...
Jagr - 11 million
Lang - 5 million
Bondra 5 million?
Gonchar - 4?
Kolzig - 7
Nylander - 3
Konowalchuk - 2
Witt - 2
That's like 40 million right there. Whatever their payroll was, it should have been enough to get them into the playoffs.
I think Leonsis was quite smart....instead of taking 3 years to dump salary he made a decision and they moved forward swiftly.....thats smart. He recognized that what he tried (spedning big) wasnt working and quickly changed
Nobody's disagreeing with that. But he still made many bad business moves leading up to the rebuild. Signing Jagr for 7 years before he even played a single game for Washington was one of them.
The Caps didn't trade away stars to start losing.
I never said that either. But Vlad is saying that the Penguins traded their stars to start losing, while the Caps did it because they're well managed. It doesn't work both ways.
I'm not saying that the salary dumps lost games for them, but the Yeats, Stroshein and Verot callups look questionable, to say the least. Not just that they were called up, but that they played regular minutes despite clearly not being able to compete at this level.
Where it's no fun is when you don't try. Is Lemieux a smarter hockey guy than Leonsis? Most probably. But he is terribly misguided and is simply not trying hard. I care about this sport and I think it is in the interest of all fans (and even more in the interest of Pittsburgh fans) to have a league where people try. Otherwise, it cheapens the sport.
What isn't Lemieux trying hard at? If anything, he's doing what Leonsis should have done since day one; sign the checks and stay out of the picture. You can't deny that Lemieux got this team out of bankruptcy. One could argue that he was just trying to get his fair share back into his pocket, but what's the excuse for keeping the team? He's not the long-term investor we need. His priorities right now (hopefully) include getting an arena built, so the team gets revenue, so they can get more investors, so they can be competitive again.
We seem to disagree on this, which is unfortunate. But hey, if you're fine with the way things are in the NHL, I am not. In this era of overscouting, it will become increasingly clear that the next step after the CBA will be to have a healthy competitive league and I think the best way to achieve this will be to award the best lottery slot to the 17th team overall, not the 30th.
If you're fine with people who give up, I am not. If the Minnesota Wild were able to achieve results from the start with NOTHING, nobody will ever make me believe the Pens couldn't do likewise. The money thing does not change the fact you can and MUST try to win. There are cheap free agents, import UFAs. Instead of dumping Jagr for picks you could have acquire a couple of cheap youngsters, sure things. Instead you end up with three guys who are in limbo and further sucking up ressorces instead of helping.
It's not that I disagree with it, I just plain don't understand your point. What are they giving up on? Winning? It's called a rebuild. Like I said, they've been out of the playoffs 3 years, not 30. At least they aren't pulling the wool over their and their fans eyes by employing 20 veterans that can't hack it, they're going young and they're doing a fairly decent job at it.
The fanbase will need to be won back, the team has totally gave up on playoffs revenue.
So you think if they had kept Straka and maybe even Kovalev, that they would have gotten to the playoffs? Because I doubt it. They would have just been paying 12 million more dollars for a non-playoff team.