The Devilish Buffoon
🇵🇸 viva 🇵🇸 free 🇵🇸
- Dec 24, 2018
- 12,214
- 10,991
They didn’t do it with Nyquist and now will lose him for nothing.I’m honestly not a fan of teams doing this. I understand scratching a player if a trade is imminent, but scratching them well before a trade is finalized seems bogus.
It's not dumb and given CBJ already had an issue with Nyquist getting hurt I'm sure they don't want to risk another asset. They have very few to move this year and he's a high end asset. It sucks, yes, but it makes sense and is not dumb.This is bogus. It's one thing if the trade is done in principal, and the teams are just waiting on the formal paperwork. But just holding a player out because he might be traded eventually is dumb.
except, this isn't about tanking. This team with or without Gavrikov is not going to change their fortune in the last 29 games or so. This team has been decimated by injuries to the point they are already icing 1/2 an AHL team. Does it hurt more? Sure, he's our best current defenseman. He's also one of the highest rated assets to move that isn't going to sign. He would be playing if Columbus was anywhere close to competing but at this point they don't want Nyquist 2.0 so they'll hold him out. Beyond Chychrun there isn't another D that can provide the value and limited cap hit that Gavy does. This makes sense.Gary Bettman had it right: there's no tanking by the coaches and players. But man, do the GMs give it their best shot.
How far will GMs go with this trend? Maybe next season someone will sit a player for "trade reasons" starting at training camp and flush the whole season away?
They are flush with assets (Top 5 prospect pool and only going to add this year)... injuries too. I get the point but this is actually a path that would make some sense. Unfortunately I don't think the timing to do this would be the trade deadline for the CBJ. May not matter given the state of the current defense.Fair enough... yet the ask of Chychrun is still two firsts, and a decent prospect. The 2024 would likely need protection.... and probably end up a 2025 pick. It's still a rich pickup, for a team who should be using these assets to build within.
Oilers shouldn't worry about whether a deadline guy is going to re-sign or not. Fix that D, get somebody in place, even as a rental, the West is prime for the taking THIS year.
Surely the CBA's grievance procedure doesn't include roster decisions though? Scratching players, for any reason, seems like SOP in the NHL. It's not like it would impact their pay?
That's what I'm asking. Is there CBA language preventing specifically this? I would be surprised but I don't know anything about the nhl cba. I wouldn't expect to see any contract have a clause that says "you cannot pay someone not to work to help your organizational future". Some players spend the better part of a year in the press box. Maybe this would have come up with taxi squads during covid?What’s stopping a team from shutting down their player a month out before the trade deadline just to play it safe and help the tank? That’s a month that would hurt the player’s salary negotiation position in UFA.
Toews is already out with a mystery illness.
Its almost like tanking on purpose. It doesn't seem right. Especially when we are over 2 weeks from the trade deadline.
Yes, should have scratched him earlier like 20 games ago amirite?Equipment allergy?
What if he gets injured and they end up with nothing?
Reading Pierre Lebrun's Article, I'm pretty convinced Gavrikov will be the guy who ends up with the Oilers. I could see they doing a deal around Picks+Puljujarvi for Gavrikov+Nyquist(LTIR until playoffs)
Would be even more funny because he refused to sign with us after we drafted him.I would trade Bruins 1st for Gavrikov as long as Columbus is taking Reilly back.
1st + 3rd + Reilly for Gavrikov.