Dave is a killer
Dave's a Mess
Trade Rumors & Free Agent forum
Poile worst summer since he's been here ('13)
Poile worst summer since he's been here ('13)
Trade Rumors & Free Agent forum
Poile worst summer since he's been here ('13)
When Carter Hutton was your most reasonable signing, your free agency was ****.Every single one of those contracts were awful.
People blame Poile and he deserve the blame but a lot of those players were hand picked by Trotz
People blame Poile and he deserve the blame but a lot of those players were hand picked by Trotz
No Trotz said numerous times the he and Poile sat down and identified every player we needed and that we got every player they identified.At best, you could argue that Trotz *might* have liked a Hendricks or Nystrom; Cullen and Stalledberg are hardly cut from the kind of players we like to think are trotz types. Well.... Hendricks - didn't have a problem trading him. Nystrom - looks like he's still staying and he played plenty under Lavy until he got hurt.
If it's not all on Poile it's mostly; plus he's the bloody GM - it's his responsibility to pick the players, and even if you want to say he's gonna' give some deference to his coaches choices he doesn't have to give out the HORRENDOUS contracts.
Stals problem is he just can't stay healthy. If you take his season out to 82 games for last year he would have had 33 pts. 5 pts behind Neal. Now I am not saying he is as good as Neal but he sure played well in Milwaukee 20 gp 17pts and 2 hat tricks. When healthy and in the right system he has shown he can score. Just not sure he can stay healthy.
I don't know how much Trotz was involved in Stalberg's acquisition. There seemed to be an immediate grudge toward Stalberg on the part of Trotz, starting at the very first training camp (prior to VS getting hurt). After recovering, he was given piecemeal scoring line icetime, and spent most of his time getting paired with Gaustad and Nystrom.
Our most recent exposure to Stalberg was this year's playoff series vs Chicago. I don't know how you could look at that and say, "god, i'd rather pay this guy not to play here than keep him."
But the team also noted Matt Cullen and Eric Nystrom as "critical components" of the roster.
Agreed on all fronts. If a Stalberg (+ for Bozak?) trade was possible, I'd be all for it, but there's no way the he is bad enough to pay not to play, and it isn't like we need the cap space.I don't know how much Trotz was involved in Stalberg's acquisition. There seemed to be an immediate grudge toward Stalberg on the part of Trotz, starting at the very first training camp (prior to VS getting hurt). After recovering, he was given piecemeal scoring line icetime, and spent most of his time getting paired with Gaustad and Nystrom.
Our most recent exposure to Stalberg was this year's playoff series vs Chicago. I don't know how you could look at that and say, "god, i'd rather pay this guy not to play here than keep him."
But the team also noted Matt Cullen and Eric Nystrom as "critical components" of the roster.
Stalberg was all speed not finish. Thought he looked better than he has and shown improvement but in the end just couldn't take it to the next level and be more of a scoring factor. Felt he was a hard worker though and gave effort but just wasn't enough. Wish him best of luck.
I can't believe we will be paying a player to play for the Rangers... that said Im OK with the roster spot it opens for someone else
It would have been better if it were Nystrom. I saw more value in Stalberg than I do at all in Nystrom, but oh well.. what is done is done now.
Meh, Nystrom has a better scoring instinct than Stalberg does at this point.
Stalberg was all speed but no finish. .