Waived: Viktor Stalberg on unconditional waivers

deanwormer

Registered User
Nov 5, 2009
1,934
0
Nashville
People blame Poile and he deserve the blame but a lot of those players were hand picked by Trotz

At best, you could argue that Trotz *might* have liked a Hendricks or Nystrom; Cullen and Stalledberg are hardly cut from the kind of players we like to think are trotz types. Well.... Hendricks - didn't have a problem trading him. Nystrom - looks like he's still staying and he played plenty under Lavy until he got hurt.

If it's not all on Poile it's mostly; plus he's the bloody GM - it's his responsibility to pick the players, and even if you want to say he's gonna' give some deference to his coaches choices he doesn't have to give out the HORRENDOUS contracts.
 

deanwormer

Registered User
Nov 5, 2009
1,934
0
Nashville
On a positive note, buying out the stinker-of-a-contract, as well as Dickie's, show's at least some financial stability and progress for the organization. Last time we had a contract like this we had to give away a young cheap PP specialist Dman to get someone to take Lombardi's deal.
 

weeze

Registered User
May 2, 2011
1,028
349
Illinois
Stals problem is he just can't stay healthy. If you take his season out to 82 games for last year he would have had 33 pts. 5 pts behind Neal. Now I am not saying he is as good as Neal but he sure played well in Milwaukee 20 gp 17pts and 2 hat tricks. When healthy and in the right system he has shown he can score. Just not sure he can stay healthy.
 

triggrman

Where is Hipcheck85
Sponsor
May 8, 2002
31,728
7,502
Murfreesboro, TN
hfboards.com
At best, you could argue that Trotz *might* have liked a Hendricks or Nystrom; Cullen and Stalledberg are hardly cut from the kind of players we like to think are trotz types. Well.... Hendricks - didn't have a problem trading him. Nystrom - looks like he's still staying and he played plenty under Lavy until he got hurt.

If it's not all on Poile it's mostly; plus he's the bloody GM - it's his responsibility to pick the players, and even if you want to say he's gonna' give some deference to his coaches choices he doesn't have to give out the HORRENDOUS contracts.
No Trotz said numerous times the he and Poile sat down and identified every player we needed and that we got every player they identified.

So he's as much to blame. Having said that, Trotz lost his job after that year. Poile's clock needs to be ticking. Our drafting has been average, trading average (one incredible, one average and a few worthless), free agent signing has been bad to average. Asset management, average at best....
 

triggrman

Where is Hipcheck85
Sponsor
May 8, 2002
31,728
7,502
Murfreesboro, TN
hfboards.com
Stals problem is he just can't stay healthy. If you take his season out to 82 games for last year he would have had 33 pts. 5 pts behind Neal. Now I am not saying he is as good as Neal but he sure played well in Milwaukee 20 gp 17pts and 2 hat tricks. When healthy and in the right system he has shown he can score. Just not sure he can stay healthy.

You can't prorate Stalberg's numbers to 82 games and compare them to Neal's 67 games.

Stalberg's prorated to 82 games points is 32.8
Neal's prorated to 82 games points is 45.2

btw, I think most of us were disappointed in Neal's production.
 

nomorekids

The original, baby
Feb 28, 2003
33,375
107
Nashville, TN
www.twitter.com
I don't know how much Trotz was involved in Stalberg's acquisition. There seemed to be an immediate grudge toward Stalberg on the part of Trotz, starting at the very first training camp (prior to VS getting hurt). After recovering, he was given piecemeal scoring line icetime, and spent most of his time getting paired with Gaustad and Nystrom.

Our most recent exposure to Stalberg was this year's playoff series vs Chicago. I don't know how you could look at that and say, "god, i'd rather pay this guy not to play here than keep him."

But the team also noted Matt Cullen and Eric Nystrom as "critical components" of the roster.
 

NSH615

...
Feb 13, 2013
11,119
981
I don't know how much Trotz was involved in Stalberg's acquisition. There seemed to be an immediate grudge toward Stalberg on the part of Trotz, starting at the very first training camp (prior to VS getting hurt). After recovering, he was given piecemeal scoring line icetime, and spent most of his time getting paired with Gaustad and Nystrom.

Our most recent exposure to Stalberg was this year's playoff series vs Chicago. I don't know how you could look at that and say, "god, i'd rather pay this guy not to play here than keep him."

But the team also noted Matt Cullen and Eric Nystrom as "critical components" of the roster.

Agree. And on the Nystrom front, he is the least critical part of the roster. With him missing, the team (especially the 4th line) seemed to run smoother. I would even go as far as to say that Watson playing in Milwaukee last year was more critical to last year's team than Nystrom.
 

klt2001

Registered User
Mar 27, 2011
4,253
292
Stalberg was all speed but no finish. Thought he looked better than he has and shown improvement but in the end just couldn't take it to the next level and be more of a scoring factor. Felt he was a hard worker though and gave effort but just wasn't enough. Wish him best of luck.
 
Last edited:

Top 6 Spaling

Registered User
Jun 23, 2010
12,341
219
Smashville
I don't know how much Trotz was involved in Stalberg's acquisition. There seemed to be an immediate grudge toward Stalberg on the part of Trotz, starting at the very first training camp (prior to VS getting hurt). After recovering, he was given piecemeal scoring line icetime, and spent most of his time getting paired with Gaustad and Nystrom.

Our most recent exposure to Stalberg was this year's playoff series vs Chicago. I don't know how you could look at that and say, "god, i'd rather pay this guy not to play here than keep him."

But the team also noted Matt Cullen and Eric Nystrom as "critical components" of the roster.
Agreed on all fronts. If a Stalberg (+ for Bozak?) trade was possible, I'd be all for it, but there's no way the he is bad enough to pay not to play, and it isn't like we need the cap space.
 

Armourboy

Hey! You suck!
Jan 20, 2014
19,320
10,673
Shelbyville, TN
Could have easily been a situation where he knew things were not going to get better here so he asked to be bought out so he could move on. Purely conjecture, but I wouldn't blame him if he did. Could be that Poile just wanted to be done with it and it was one less vet clogging up the pipeline. It's not like he was really needed.
 

Byrddog

Lifer
Nov 23, 2007
7,482
826
You have to think that Poile has tried to shop him around and found no interest probably due in large part to the contract. Placing him on waivers was a last attempt to move on without costing the team anything. He was unwilling to trade another asset with the guy to move him so he is forced to place him on unconditional waivers and buy him out. There will be a team that will take a chance on him for a cheap contract Florida and Arizona come to mind. Stalberg for all his flaws has been a professional through all of this. He did all that was asked of him without trashing the organization.
 

PredsV82

Trade Saros
Sponsor
Aug 13, 2007
35,471
15,736
im guessing any trade scenarios Poile had would have required us to take back someone elses bad contract and/or retain salary and cap hit, and in the end it was probably the most economical thing to just buy him out.

I think Stalberg would be the kind of guy who would do well on an expansion team. Hope he can hang on and stay in the league until expansion happens.
 

adsfan

#164303
May 31, 2008
12,731
3,769
Milwaukee
Stalberg was all speed not finish. Thought he looked better than he has and shown improvement but in the end just couldn't take it to the next level and be more of a scoring factor. Felt he was a hard worker though and gave effort but just wasn't enough. Wish him best of luck.

That was my impression in Milwaukee. If he could finish, he would have doubled his points scored in the AHL.
 

PredsV82

Trade Saros
Sponsor
Aug 13, 2007
35,471
15,736
I can't believe we will be paying a player to play for the Rangers... that said Im OK with the roster spot it opens for someone else
 

NSH615

...
Feb 13, 2013
11,119
981
I can't believe we will be paying a player to play for the Rangers... that said Im OK with the roster spot it opens for someone else

It would have been better if it were Nystrom. I saw more value in Stalberg than I do at all in Nystrom, but oh well.. what is done is done now.
 

NSH615

...
Feb 13, 2013
11,119
981
Meh, Nystrom has a better scoring instinct than Stalberg does at this point.

Better scoring instinct?

Regular season last year:

Player | GP | G | A | P | PPG
Eric Nystrom|60|7|5|12|0.20
Viktor Stalberg|25|2|8|10|0.40

Oh and the playoffs, I realize that Nystrom did not play but...

Player | GP | G | A | P | PPG
Viktor Stalberg|6|1|2|3|0.50


While Nystrom may have had more goals, he also played more games but had half the PPG rate of Stalberg. I would have liked to have seen Viktor for a longer stint than we had him, but oh well.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad