ptbopete
Registered User
So the Peterborough Petes played Sarnia last week in an important game for both teams fighting for playoff positioning. As reported here:
http://www.thepeterboroughexaminer.com/2016/01/23/disallowed-goal-costs-petes-points
The Petes had a goal by Steve Lorentz that was questioned for some reason by the refs and the refs went to the video review. I assumed it was a missed offside call or some sort of intereference leading to the questioning of the goal. The video review ruled it not a goal. The Sarnia play-by-play guy remarked that he could not understand why it was not a goal. Nor could I . There was no announcement about it. The Petes end up losing by a goal (of course). The Petes said they would ask the League about it on Monday.
There has been no public response since by the Petes or the OHL and little talk about it here or on the Petes Message Board.
Is this just a case of turning the other cheek or do the Petes have an argument for appealing, and if so, what can the League do to rectify their mistake , if indeed they made a mistake?
http://www.thepeterboroughexaminer.com/2016/01/23/disallowed-goal-costs-petes-points
The Petes had a goal by Steve Lorentz that was questioned for some reason by the refs and the refs went to the video review. I assumed it was a missed offside call or some sort of intereference leading to the questioning of the goal. The video review ruled it not a goal. The Sarnia play-by-play guy remarked that he could not understand why it was not a goal. Nor could I . There was no announcement about it. The Petes end up losing by a goal (of course). The Petes said they would ask the League about it on Monday.
There has been no public response since by the Petes or the OHL and little talk about it here or on the Petes Message Board.
Is this just a case of turning the other cheek or do the Petes have an argument for appealing, and if so, what can the League do to rectify their mistake , if indeed they made a mistake?