Vancouver Canucks Mount Rushmore

[RSPens]

Not that the younger crowd (under 50) would give him many votes, I kinda feel like Brodeur should at least be an option, although it'd be hard to decide between him and McLean, he should at least get some respect for being the main reason the Canucks were in the finals in 1982.

 

[The Nuge]

Feels odd that Bure has so many votes. He’s so clearly behind the twins, Naslund, and Linden imo

 

[Pip]

Naslund still had 25P in 27GP int he playoffs at the peak of the dead puck era (01-04). Bure had great playoff numbers too, but all in a much higher scoring era (91-95).

I think you’d be hard pressed to find too many Canucks fans who would take Naslund over Bure

Not that the younger crowd (under 50) would give him many votes, I kinda feel like Brodeur should at least be an option, although it'd be hard to decide between him and McLean, he should at least get some respect for being the main reason the Canucks were in the finals in 1982.

I don’t see an argument for either over Luongo

 

[nucksflailtogether]

Feels wrong to not include Naslund in a Canucks Mount Rushmore.

I agree but his peak was too short and he fell off hard, also started slow. Definitely a higher peak than Linden but less consistency and Trevor was so clutch in the playoffs.

Feels odd that Bure has so many votes. He’s so clearly behind the twins, Naslund, and Linden imo

Bure reinvigorated a franchise that was floundering for 20+ years. Most talented player in our history. Imo Nazzy isn't close, as much as I enjoyed his career.

 

[tabness]

I think of Naslund and Bertuzzi just as much as the Sedins when thinking about the Canucks. Also Luongo is one of the few goalies I'd ever give consideration for one of these things even though it ended poorly just cause of this:



Bure and Linden obviously the headlining nineties Canucks

 

[biturbo19]

Sedins as a combo unit, as it should be. Bure, Linden...and probably Naslund for the last spot.