How the hell did we get on Tanev AGAIN on a thread that was about the 7th OV pick?
As it pertains to Tanev, unless there is an overpayment, we are better off to keep him and let him groom Juolevi. If we move him now for market value, or less than which is what everyone here keeps posting, then Juelovi will end up playing with one of Stecher, Gudbrandson, Pouliot or Biega. That is terrible in terms of helping him develop in the NHL. So again for the millionth time, unless we get something crazy, Tanev will stay. He turns 29 next season, so he's not really that old. If we can lock him into a 3 year deal after this contract that would be ideal in all honesty. It's not like he doesn't like Vancouver, the only reason we are looking at potentially moving him is to accelerate a rebuild; however, he very well could still be part of that group.
As for the OP which is what we should be discussing.... There's no real reason to trade down for us. We have the likes of Granlund, Baertschi and Hutton who could be moved for picks as is. At 7 we will be able to select either a faller like Tkachuk or a very good defensive prospect in my order of preference: Bouchard, Dobson, Hughes, Boquist.