The Devilish Buffoon
🇵🇸 viva 🇵🇸 free 🇵🇸
- Dec 24, 2018
- 12,190
- 10,973
wild guess, insulation cause we have an RFA that has a cloud hanging over them....Y tho?
Why not? He's a very good bottom 6er and we dont necessarily have every spot spoken for.Y tho?
4th line LW/C I’m assuming. Better option then Gaudette and Kelly, especially to move up the line up if there are injuries.I dont get understand, wheres he gonna play?
Third line lwI dont get understand, wheres he gonna play?
I doubt the team is ready to designate Kelly as an every-day player. And then, of course, there is the Formenton question.I dont get understand, wheres he gonna play?
Best case, we make a trade along the lines of what I said above and Grieg shows he is ready to play. Have Kelly and Motte battle for 4LW. Not saying they will start him at 3LW regardless, but if we are making a run... could be the plan.Third line lw
He’s a centre, but could play wing.Third line lw
Yeah im thinking the Formenton negotiation isn't going anywhere, or like you said maybe he gets dealtI doubt the team is ready to designate Kelly as an every-day player. And then, of course, there is the Formenton question.
With the moves we've made, Formenton + Zaitsev for a D makes a ton of sense to me, even if we ignore the uncertainty around him.
Best case, we make a trade along the lines of what I said above and Grieg shows he is ready to play. Have Kelly and Motte battle for 4LW. Not saying they will start him at 3LW regardless, but if we are making a run... could be the plan.
Formenton is a tricky one. It seems inevitable that he will be dealt at some point... the question has been, "can we trade him without creating a bigger hole than the one we are filling?". As long as the answer is "no", and as long as he can fit in under the cap on a season-by-season basis, holding onto him makes sense.Yeah im thinking the Formenton negotiation isn't going anywhere, or like you said maybe he gets dealt
Probably, but trading Formenton has always made a bit of sense and this move makes trading him more palatable.You guys are going pretty off the board here with regards to Formenton. This just seems like a depth move.
Formenton is a tricky one. It seems inevitable that he will be dealt at some point... the question has been, "can we trade him without creating a bigger hole than the one we are filling?". As long as the answer is "no", and as long as he can fit in under the cap on a season-by-season basis, holding onto him makes sense.
Now that we've added Motte, maybe we feel the answer to that question is "yes", and therefore now is as good a time as any to cut bait.
Probably, but trading Formenton has always made a bit of sense and this move makes trading him more palatable.
I am not banking on it, but its a possibility.
No, you're right, that's what Giroux and Debrincat (and eventually Greig) are.Motte is in no way a potential replacement for Formenton.