Mind sharing the the statistical evidence that supports Marner being paid 11m or the idea that half your payroll can be spent on 4 forwards.
Ceci is a statistical black hole and Dubas put him in our top 4. How about the statistical evidence that says playing a terrible backup goalie 20 times a year is a good idea.
- The 11 million was a bad move. Marner is NOT worth 11 million. Even if he was, Dubas should have gotten it for 8 years.
- 40 million
CAN be spent on 4 forwards. We're literally doing it right now, with the best roster we've assembled in the past 20 years.
- We literally
HAD to sign Ceci. Ottawa gave Ceci a qualifying offer, meaning Ceci either could go to arbritation or agree to the team's terms. Babcock is the one playing him on the top-pair. He should no-where near the top-pairing, he's a 2nd pair level defender but that's on Babcock.
- Hutchinson literally has a career .907 sv%. He is playing at .885 sv%, the 2nd worst of his career. Maybe want to wait a bit, before jumping to conclusions?