jkrx
Registered User
- Feb 4, 2010
- 4,337
- 21
I didn't even bother watching it, because I knew it would be a sham. (Although I did crack a smile when I tuned in and saw Gilbert Perrault in the top 10). I saw their top 10 hitters, and they lost all credibility when Nik Kronwall was at No. 10. (I'm a Kronwall fan; I think he's a top 15-20 defenceman in the game, and he just needs an opportunity for everyone to realize it). But is Kronwall a top 10 hitter ever? Far from it.
Rule of thumb: if you're going to be on this list, you should be a gimmie for a first-ballot HHOFer. Datsyuk will probably get in if he has a couple more seasons like 07-08 or 08-09. Bure's 0-5. (Keep swinging, Pavel). Kent Nilsson isn't mentioned among the best not in the HHOF. Anyone who knows hockey realizes that Kovalev won't make it. Way too many negatives.
Kent Nilsson had maybe the best set of hands I've ever seen. He truly was the Magic Man. But you're going to rate him ahead of Beliveau, Hull, Mikita, the Rocket and Lafleur? Yikes.
I think they needed a broader definition of skill. We talk skill from an offensive perspective. But it's much more than that. I think Bob McKenzie said it best in "Hockey Dad" when he said that competitiveness is a skill. If it is, and it most certainly is (ask anyone who makes money in hockey in an on-ice or management capacity, and they well tell you as much), then you can scratch Kovalev and Nilsson from that list.
Its a list of skills only and probably flashy stick skills. Not skills-career or how well they used their skills on a regular basis. Mikita and Hull isnt better than Kent Nilsson when it comes to that. This is also why a guy like Denis Savard is on the list.