Florida is gonna have some decisions to make. Cap going up but they signed Forsling and his new contract kicks in next year which is pretty much the cap they'd get from the cap raising. Reinhart and Montour are going to be asking for huge raises and Reinhart might be asking for 10+ mil but maybe since it's Florida he'll get like 9.5 which is what Tkachuk got because of the taxes BS. It can be done to keep both but their depth won't be as good as they've had it. I think they'll stick with Reinhart and let Montour walk. Reinhart younger and was their leading scorer and Montour is already 30 most likely seeking an 8 year deal and he's pretty much only had 1 very good season in his career and Forsling can produce the same as Montour.Montour would be great but I don't see him leaving Florida.
No. Huberdeau had one year left when he was traded, the same as Marner. Huberdeau was 29 when he was traded. Marner will be 27 this summer.Marner is also what, 3 or 4 years younger. Plus an extra year of term.
I get the premise of using the other trade as a potential framing, but Marner should hold more value
That is exactly why Marner=Huberdeau. Marner isn't asking out. Florida wanted to move on from Huberdeau because they didn't want to sign his next deal, just like the Leafs with Marner.I see your point. While I disagree because the situations are different (Tkachuk asked out not Huberdeau, etc)
Marner for a goalie doesnt seem very smart.Marner for Saros enough?
Marner for Sorokin?
Marner for a goalie doesnt seem very smart.
In what regard?I can’t help but look at Montour and think about Liljegren’s development
Then they'll have to get a bit tough with them. Sort 3 trade scenarios with each of them, and then they can choose where they go from there.Not that this is the time for this, but....
Speculation aside, neither JT nor Marner are going to want to waive their NMCs. Leaving the team after this went down would be an extra humiliation, and both men are locals with ties to the city. Last night's game isn't going to be enough to change that.
This is bigger than 1 game. The humiliation goes back to the CBJ series.Not that this is the time for this, but....
Speculation aside, neither JT nor Marner are going to want to waive their NMCs. Leaving the team after this went down would be an extra humiliation, and both men are locals with ties to the city. Last night's game isn't going to be enough to change that.
I don't know about that. I agree on JT, but I think with Marner's contract status up in the air (while Matthews and Nylander are locked in) and another potential difficult negotiation coming up, plus the ever growing media scrutiny around him he'd actually be open to moving on and getting a fresh start. Being tied to the city isn't always a good thing, it wasn't enough to endear ROR who didn't like the attention and media, and other locals who grew up Leaf fans like Seguin have let it be known about how they'd never play here. Many people like to separate their home and work life. Marner also seems to hate the media and he can't really handle the pressure of this market. He may be best suited to go somewhere with less scrutiny and where he may be insulated better.Not that this is the time for this, but....
Speculation aside, neither JT nor Marner are going to want to waive their NMCs. Leaving the team after this went down would be an extra humiliation, and both men are locals with ties to the city. Last night's game isn't going to be enough to change that.
I think there is a fair argument that Marner has been a superior player to Nylander at every point of their tenures as Leafs and he deserves to be paid more. Neither of them deserve >10M which is the larger issue.The reality is that he will want more money than Willy and he's done nothing to really earn that.
Not that this is the time for this, but....
Speculation aside, neither JT nor Marner are going to want to waive their NMCs. Leaving the team after this went down would be an extra humiliation, and both men are locals with ties to the city. Last night's game isn't going to be enough to change that.
That argument has really dried up the last couple of years especially with Matthews showing he doesn't need Marner yet Marner has to be stapled to Matthews, and I don't believe for a second that going forward Marner will provide more value than Nylander when it really matters.I think there is a fair argument that Marner has been a superior player to Nylander at every point of their tenures as Leafs and he deserves to be paid more. Neither of them deserve >10M which is the larger issue.
Exactly. Plenty of hometown guys never want to play here. Stamkos had the chance and he balked as well (smart man)What’s the point of being a hometown star if you can’t go anywhere without people being shitty to you? I don’t think Clarkson’s stint with us improved his hometown experience at all.
Nylander has definitely closed the gap offensively although he can't drive a line either. The gap is defensively. Nylander's offensive ceiling is higher than Marner but Marner is more consistent.That argument has really dried up the last couple of years especially with Matthews showing he doesn't need Marner yet Marner has to be stapled to Matthews, and I don't believe for a second that going forward Marner will provide more value than Nylander when it really matters.
Not that this is the time for this, but....
Speculation aside, neither JT nor Marner are going to want to waive their NMCs. Leaving the team after this went down would be an extra humiliation, and both men are locals with ties to the city. Last night's game isn't going to be enough to change that.
Marners consistency is pretty questionable. Multiple playoffs where he becomes a ghost. A regular no show in October.Nylander has definitely closed the gap offensively although he can't drive a line either. The gap is defensively. Nylander's offensive ceiling is higher than Marner but Marner is more consistent.
If I was building a team I wouldn't take either player on their future contracts.
I don't disagree.Marners consistency is pretty questionable. Multiple playoffs where he becomes a ghost. A regular no show in October.
This is bigger than 1 game. The humiliation goes back to the CBJ series.
I agree that Tavares won't waive. He has young kids, him and his wife are local. He'd probably retire instead of moving his family when his next contract is up.
Marner on the other hand has 10 years or so left in his career. He has one, maybe 2 big contracts to go. If Toronto makes it clear that he will not get that contract here, therefore he won't be a Leaf beyond next season anyway - I could see him being open to a move to a team that would want him.
In what regard?
That they'll move him, and he'll start putting big points up?
I think they'll get more than a mid-round pick back if they do choose to move him.How long it took him to stabilize himself as a quality top 4 defensemen .. traded for a mid round pick to Buffalo and again another mid round pick for Florida.
Sometime it just takes time with defensemen.
He is a UFA....he isn't getting a 1st or 2nd back lolI think they'll get more than a mid-round pick back if they do choose to move him.
Liljegren is an RFA.He is a UFA....he isn't getting a 1st or 2nd back lol