Quote it. Show me where I attacked you personally. I'll wait.
Twice.
"Less so than the impressions of random stans who think they their opinion matters."
"If you're so arrogant to dismiss analytics outright, you shouldn't value your own selective view on things either."
All because I disagreed that advanced stats were a good way of evaluating someone like Russell. Another poster commented on this. But I'm the arrogant one because you'd rather go at the poster instead of the post. Okay.
That's not a 325 sample. That's a 47 game sample. You're comparing the time he missed to the time he played. The time he missed is the relevant piece for juxtaposition.
Comparing how a team does when he plays one-third of a game to how they do when he's out of the lineup isn't a 47 game sample. And that wasn't even the point of the post. The point was to show he's not some crap player who is preventing his teams from winning.