Caps continue to falter
Ribiero would look so nice between Sharp and Hossa
Caps continue to falter
Ribiero would look so nice between Sharp and Hossa
Ribiero is not good on faceoffs but he's a pretty good playmaker and more importantly he's on an expiring contract. With his playmaking ability, I might rather have Kane and Ribiero on separate lines.
Either
Saad-Toews-Kane
Sharp-Ribiero-Hossa
or
Sharp-Toews-Kane
Saad-Ribiero-Hossa
Ribiero setting up Hossa/Sharp shots
Yeah I think I prefer that option too. And then of course it sets up lines 3 & 4 very nicely too. The only question there would be whether to keep 29-65-25 together and put Bolland with Kruger and Frolik in a more traditional checking line. That would give the Hawks two #1 lines and two #3 lines. There won't be enough ice time
Lines 3 & 4 options:
Bickell-Shaw-Stalberg
Kruger-Bolland-Frolik
or
Bickell-Bolland-Stalberg
Shaw-Kruger-Frolik
I think I like option #1 best. Q can use either line as the checking line depending which line is playing best that particular game.
Saad-Toews-Kane - Line1A
Sharp-Ribiero-Hossa - Line1b
Bickell-Shaw-Stalberg - Line3A
Kruger-Bolland-Frolik - Line3B
Ribiero setting up Hossa/Sharp shots
It would be a defendable go-for-it move.
I think the guy I want most is Sam Gagner. I know it's been a while but Kane and Gagner played together in London. So there's some familiarity there.
Gagner is making 3.25 mil and is a RFA next year... so acquiring him means either bye bye Hammer or bye bye Bolly.
The Oilers supposedly might be entertaining moving him... maybe it works out here.
Yeah, option 1 is pretty much what I suggested in the player usage chart thread. Didn't think about flipping Kane and Hossa, but I really like that idea. Holy crap would this team be insane! My biggest worry would be finding enough ice time for 3B. Great problem to have!Yeah I think I prefer that option too. And then of course it sets up lines 3 & 4 very nicely too. The only question there would be whether to keep 29-65-25 together and put Bolland with Kruger and Frolik in a more traditional checking line. That would give the Hawks two #1 lines and two #3 lines. There won't be enough ice time
Lines 3 & 4 options:
Bickell-Shaw-Stalberg
Kruger-Bolland-Frolik
or
Bickell-Bolland-Stalberg
Shaw-Kruger-Frolik
I think I like option #1 best. Q can use either line as the checking line depending which line is playing best that particular game.
Saad-Toews-Kane - Line1A
Sharp-Ribiero-Hossa - Line1b
Bickell-Shaw-Stalberg - Line3A
Kruger-Bolland-Frolik - Line3B
Gagner instead of those 2? No thanks.I think the guy I want most is Sam Gagner. I know it's been a while but Kane and Gagner played together in London. So there's some familiarity there.
Gagner is making 3.25 mil and is a RFA next year... so acquiring him means either bye bye Hammer or bye bye Bolly.
Gagner instead of those 2? No thanks.
Bolland is going to want to make more than the 3.5 he's making right now... And the Hawks can't afford him anyway....His skill set has proven to be best on a non scoring line, he can't be our 2nd C.... it might be time for us to part ways with him
We're going to have to lose one of them anyway...or lose Stalberg...Bickell...etc.. another mini cap crisis is coming...
Gagner at 4 could end up better than Bolland at 4
Gagner is a #2 Center. Shaw can take Bollands #3 spot (or Krüger, who knows.) One of them will be our #3 C of the future.
I wouldn't be against adding Gagner within the next 2-3 weeks and trade Bolland in the summer if needed.
Say goodbye to having a C that can shut down the opposing teams top line. If you think Shaw or Kruger can do that, you're crazy.
No thanks to Gagner, especially at $4mil/year.
Ribiero and Visnovsky wouldn't be bad choices all.
Visnovsky would finally be on a team worth playing for, maybe that would help his game.
I have no idea what NYI would even want for him. Would they be absolutely set on getting back the pick they gave up for him?