Proposal: Trade Proposal Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Monctonscout

Monctonscout
Jan 26, 2008
34,935
1
I want a trade that sends DD or Gionta away, MT is too limited in what he can do with lines when he always has to 'balance' out the smurf factor.

Then you end up adding a lesser skilled guy into the top 9.
 

Sterling Archer

Registered User
Sep 26, 2006
22,988
13,457
Who here would trade Tinodi or Beaulieu ++ for one of Edmonton's young guns i.e. Yakopov?

They have a glut of offence but NOO defense to speak of and we need a pure scorer up front.

Price would be steep but reuniting Galchenyuk and Yakopov and throwing in a Gallagher would be a fatal line for years to come. I think those two have a lot of potential but I'd pull the trigger on a trade like that in a second.
 

Frozenice

No Reverse Gear
Jan 1, 2010
7,021
521
Maybe Yak benefitted from playing with Gally more then other way around.

Look at Kane and Kostitsyn. Kosti was a beast in the juniors but after both getting drafted he disappeared.

When SK got ice time in Nashville, he was one of their top scorers, how is that disappearing?
 

Habsawce

Registered User
Nov 16, 2010
31,301
2,607
Canada
Montreal doesn't have anyone they'd be willing to trade that could get Yakupov in return.

Unless Edmonton wants quantity there's a slim to zero chance he'll dawn the CH anytime in this decade.
 

Sterling Archer

Registered User
Sep 26, 2006
22,988
13,457
Montreal doesn't have anyone they'd be willing to trade that could get Yakupov in return.

Unless Edmonton wants quantity there's a slim to zero chance he'll dawn the CH anytime in this decade.

I dunno about that. They seem like teams that are well matched to make a trade. One team loaded with forwards and the other with defense. I'm sure if they wanted to make a deal, one could be had.
 

Monctonscout

Monctonscout
Jan 26, 2008
34,935
1
Who here would trade Tinodi or Beaulieu ++ for one of Edmonton's young guns i.e. Yakopov?

They have a glut of offence but NOO defense to speak of and we need a pure scorer up front.

Price would be steep but reuniting Galchenyuk and Yakopov and throwing in a Gallagher would be a fatal line for years to come. I think those two have a lot of potential but I'd pull the trigger on a trade like that in a second.

Schultz Smid Petry Belov are a pretty good young core to start with, then they have Nurse Klefblom Musil and Marincin on the way. I think their future on defense is very bright.

Where Edmonton is weak is they have few quality vets.
 

HatTricK09

Registered User
Jun 23, 2012
3,782
0
I dunno about that. They seem like teams that are well matched to make a trade. One team loaded with forwards and the other with defense. I'm sure if they wanted to make a deal, one could be had.

Only defense I can see the Oilers having an interest in for Yakupov is one of Subban, Tinordi or Beaulieu

Subban we can all agree he isn't going anywhere

Tinordi is what we have been looking for forever, he's a gem to us, not going anywhere either

Beaulieu maybe if we do +, or even ++
 

Compile

Registered User
Feb 27, 2008
4,191
149
In an Igloo
Only defense I can see the Oilers having an interest in for Yakupov is one of Subban, Tinordi or Beaulieu

Subban we can all agree he isn't going anywhere

Tinordi is what we have been looking for forever, he's a gem to us, not going anywhere either

Beaulieu maybe if we do +, or even ++

Edm would have to add to get Subban. Yak wouldn't be enough alone to get him.

You know he is the reigning best dman in the league.
 
Last edited:

Znthnk

Registered User
Nov 2, 2010
181
6
I think the ideal trading partner is Dallas. Other conference, struggling offensively but stingy defensively. Perhaps trading Desharnais for a Dallas defenceman. I don't know which D, but it might be a deal that helps both teams. Not to mention Gainey is there, and he might find a right fit for Desharnais.
 

Sorinth

Registered User
Jan 18, 2013
11,056
5,547
To be honest we have Tinordi and Beaulieu coming in the next year or two which they will be full timers and instead of trading for Myers who has been going downhill for 3 years now I'd rather keep Markov around for another year or even 2

They might be full time NHLers but that doesn't mean they will be better than Myers. I personally think Myers would bounce back with us so I don't mind trading a Beaulieu for him. At the end of the day you're trading potential of developing for potential of rebounding so it comes down to which you think is more likely.

Then you end up adding a lesser skilled guy into the top 9.

This is not necessarily a bad thing. If DD gets traded for a shutdown center you can't say "Oh he doesn't put up as many points therefore we are worse". A shutdown guy would take away defensive responsibilities from Plekanec/Eller and open them up for more offence. Having players that are better suited to their roles helps even if they are less skilled.
 

Sterling Archer

Registered User
Sep 26, 2006
22,988
13,457
Schultz Smid Petry Belov are a pretty good young core to start with, then they have Nurse Klefblom Musil and Marincin on the way. I think their future on defense is very bright.

Where Edmonton is weak is they have few quality vets.

I don't think any of those guys other than Schultz and Nurse has the same tools as guys like Beaulieu or Tinordi. Also the guys on that list are still not as close to NHL ready as the aformentioned Tins and Beaulieu.

That being said, I used them as they're very good trade chips but outside of PK, there's no one on our D I wouldn't trade for one of their top pick kids, Markov included. Same for our forwards outside of Patches, Gally's and Eller I'd be willing to trade anyone.

Only defense I can see the Oilers having an interest in for Yakupov is one of Subban, Tinordi or Beaulieu

Subban we can all agree he isn't going anywhere

Tinordi is what we have been looking for forever, he's a gem to us, not going anywhere either

Beaulieu maybe if we do +, or even ++

Read above response and initial post. Outside of PK, anyone goes on defense IMO.
 

Draft

Registered User
Jan 23, 2013
8,437
5,116
I think the ideal trading partner is Dallas. Other conference, struggling offensively but stingy defensively. Perhaps trading Desharnais for a Dallas defenceman. I don't know which D, but it might be a deal that helps both teams. Not to mention Gainey is there, and he might find a right fit for Desharnais.

Robidas? :dunno: He's a better option than Bouillon IMO. Kind of a crappy return but I know Robidas wants to play here and he does have an expiring contract.

Pacioretty-Eller-Briere
Galchenyuk-Plekanec-Gallagher
Bourque-Bournival-Gionta
Moen-White-Prust

Markov-Subban
Gorges-Diaz
Murray-Robidas
(Bouillon, Drewiskie)

Or what about Vernon Fiddler for Desharnais? We could use a defensive/faceoff guy.
 
Last edited:
Dec 2, 2010
11,393
31
Robidas may be the most attainable but I'd set my eyes on Daley. And keep in mind that the way Dallas has been shaping up, their focus is strong on being bigger and younger. Look at their roster players and recent drafted players (Ritchie, Nichushkin, Chiasson, Stransky, Faksa, Oleksiak, etc.) Desharnais is unlikely to be a convincing target.
 

Habsawce

Registered User
Nov 16, 2010
31,301
2,607
Canada
I wonder if the Rangers continue to struggle, Dan Girardi might be had for the right deal. Perhaps something around Josh Gorges?

He would be a great partner for Subban and Markov and Emelin can go back together till Tinordi is ready to play with Emelin and Markov can be a PP specialist.
 

Dharvey33

Registered User
Apr 30, 2010
3,238
156
I still don't know why we didn't signed lapierre. I loved him when he was a hab, skates, plays well on the pk, can score, can hit. Would have been perfect for our 4th line with Prust, Moen, Parros.
 

Dominator13

Registered User
Feb 20, 2003
19,484
1,057
hockey city
Dominator13
I think the ideal trading partner is Dallas. Other conference, struggling offensively but stingy defensively. Perhaps trading Desharnais for a Dallas defenceman. I don't know which D, but it might be a deal that helps both teams. Not to mention Gainey is there, and he might find a right fit for Desharnais.

Don't forget the Erik Cole connection...
 

Habit11

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
3,647
950
As much as I think DD is untradeable unless you are taking back similar term/money for a player who is less than desirable (to put it nicely), the Eric Cole connection may be a selling point to Dallas if they are looking for help scoring. Robidas as mentioned here already would be an upgrade over Diaz on the 2nd pairing, and could be a good fit with Gorges or Markov.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad