Proposal: Toronto-Florida

DougGilmour93

Registered User
Feb 7, 2007
7,395
702
Kadri
Bracco

For

McCann
Hawryluk
Heponiemi


Florida adds a quality asset and an upgrade at center. Leafs get to shed a little salary that that can allocate to defense moving forward.
 

oooooooooohCanada

Registered User
Jan 14, 2017
2,091
1,547
Rather not move Kadri for an unproven undersized spec. For all we know Bracco (point per game in the AHL in his age 21 season) could end up better than any piece returned.
 

Liferleafer

TSN Scrum Lurker
Feb 9, 2011
39,848
13,005
Kadri
Bracco

For

McCann
Hawryluk
Heponiemi


Florida adds a quality asset and an upgrade at center. Leafs get to shed a little salary that that can allocate to defense moving forward.
So we save a whole 4.5 million while getting bent over in this trade? Yippee....
 

TorontoTrades

Registered User
Feb 4, 2012
6,459
2,194
Well, my thought process was, yes it would suck to lose Kadri as having a 1-2-3 punch was nice, but could we acquire a lesser 3rd line center and free up some money.


Ummm no. You dont do that. You deal him for DMan.. you dont move him for a big downgrades and some forward prospects.
 

DougGilmour93

Registered User
Feb 7, 2007
7,395
702
So we save a whole 4.5 million while getting bent over in this trade? Yippee....
I think you’re discrediting the assets coming back.
Bracco and Hawryluk are almost a wash.
So Kadri for McCann and Heponiemi.
McCann can play a decent 2way game and could fill the 3rd center spot somewhat admirably, we get a decent prospect in Hepo and we save salary.
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
79,010
53,954
Sure...but we are a (current) playoff team, what good is trading Kadri for "could be"?

I guess the concept is you would unload Kadri at some point to save on his $4.5 million cap hit for the third line center position, and get some prospects who may come up after the Kapanen/Johnsson wave, keeping the cheap talent flowing as the core gets locked into bigger contracts.

If the Leafs were to ever trade Kadri, I'd look for something in the neighborhood of what Ryan O'Reilly went for, factoring in he's less productive but much cheaper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DougGilmour93

DougGilmour93

Registered User
Feb 7, 2007
7,395
702
Ummm no. You dont do that. You deal him for DMan.. you dont move him for a big downgrades and some forward prospects.
Imo, in order to get that dman we so covet, we’re going to need to deal the likes of Nylander. Probably gonna have to be Nylander +
 

Liferleafer

TSN Scrum Lurker
Feb 9, 2011
39,848
13,005
I think you’re discrediting the assets coming back.
Bracco and Hawryluk are almost a wash.
So Kadri for McCann and Heponiemi.
McCann can play a decent 2way game and could fill the 3rd center spot somewhat admirably, we get a decent prospect in Hepo and we save salary.
And we head into the playoffs minus Kadri and without a D upgrade....yay, capspace....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sundinisagod

DougGilmour93

Registered User
Feb 7, 2007
7,395
702
And we head into the playoffs minus Kadri and without a D upgrade....yay, capspace....
Why wouldn’t we make a deal for a defensemen? Nylander can still be traded. If Dubas can’t see that he has to treat his players like they are assets than we should fire him already. He’s in the wrong line of work.
 

DougGilmour93

Registered User
Feb 7, 2007
7,395
702
Ideally in my mind, we deal Nylander in a deal for Manson + (Jones?).
Then deal Liljegren + for Muzzin.
Then our 1st and Timashov for Ferland.
Then our 2nd in 20 + our 4th in 19 for Gudas.
And of course the Kadri deal.

Hyman-Tavares-Marner
Johnsson-Matthews-Ferland
Marleau-McCann-Kapanen
Moore-Lindholm-Brown

Reilly-Manson
Dermott-Muzzin
Hainsey-Gudas

Anderson
Sparks
 

member 147413

Guest
Ideally in my mind, we deal Nylander in a deal for Manson + (Jones?).
Then deal Liljegren + for Muzzin.
Then our 1st and Timashov for Ferland.
Then our 2nd in 20 + our 4th in 19 for Gudas.
And of course the Kadri deal.

Hyman-Tavares-Marner
Johnsson-Matthews-Ferland
Marleau-McCann-Kapanen
Moore-Lindholm-Brown

Reilly-Manson
Dermott-Muzzin
Hainsey-Gudas

Anderson
Sparks
I think we need to trade more players!

It’s fun to be an armchair GM, but not many teams shuffle this many deck chairs midseason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DougGilmour93

SeaOfBlue

The Passion That Unites Us All
Aug 1, 2013
35,591
16,773
Imo, in order to get that dman we so covet, we’re going to need to deal the likes of Nylander. Probably gonna have to be Nylander +

So then deal Nylander... You save money so you do not need to get bent over on a trade, and you keep the better player while saving more money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sundinisagod

letsgrowcactus

Registered User
Jan 21, 2017
4,725
4,933
Kadri
Bracco

For

McCann
Hawryluk
Heponiemi


Florida adds a quality asset and an upgrade at center. Leafs get to shed a little salary that that can allocate to defense moving forward.
As the Patient Panther said, if we're trading Heponiemi it must be for an upgrade at D. As of now, this does very little for us.
 

patriotfan

Registered User
Jun 8, 2014
520
94
Kadri
Bracco

For

McCann
Hawryluk
Heponiemi


Florida adds a quality asset and an upgrade at center. Leafs get to shed a little salary that that can allocate to defense moving forward.
no chance that happens from the leafs side...……...
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad