hotpaws
Registered User
- Nov 21, 2009
- 21,630
- 6,220
Get a clue, then go on offence.yeah because dubas did anything at all In This trade. Give ya noggin a shake
Fixed it!Well Dubas is an OHL stick boy....................................
Schmaltz and Harpur were not very good and definitely not the depth they thought they were getting. They were dumped in "let's see if they can work for us" trades and they never really did that well.
And to say they were decimated with injuries isn't really accurate since it's only 2 injuries, both replaced by Sandin and Liljegren, as well as Marincin.
The Leafs also traded for Rosen.
29 years old
5'9" 171 lbs
9 goals and -17 in 50 AHL games
Won't get too excited for this arrival...
I'm now switching my grade for Dubas this deadline from an F to an A.
29 years old
5'9" 171 lbs
9 goals and -17 in 50 AHL games
Won't get too excited for this arrival...
I see the flood of negative comments are already in on a player likely zero here people have seen play more than a game lol
Kind of curious what the thought process was on this one.
GP 2 | G 0 | A 0 | P 0 | PIM 2 | +/- -4 |
Thx for your expert analysisToronto Marlies
Small sample size but on an Marlies 76 game pace for 0 points and -152. Good pickup.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
GP 2 G 0 A 0 P 0 PIM 2 +/- -4
Toronto Marlies
Small sample size but on an Marlies 76 game pace for 0 points and -152. Good pickup.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
GP 2 G 0 A 0 P 0 PIM 2 +/- -4
Retired and part time comedian!What do you do for a living?
Schmaltz was awful for the Marlies. I'm sure this was intended to open up ice time for people who could possibly one day play for the Leafs.Me too!! Was Schmaltz so bad this year he could be dumped to make room for Hollowell and Duszak?
Meanwhile Borgman is a team best +11 for St louis affiliate.Surprised they went through the trouble of acquiring him and then not auditioning him the same way as Borgman whom they gave up to get him.