Prospect Info: Top 20 Flyers Prospects(#14)

[BillyShoe1721]

1. C Scott Laughton(77.36%)
2. D Samuel Morin(59.70%)
3. D Robert Hagg(69.74%)
4. D Shayne Gostisbehere(66.30%)
5. G Anthony Stolarz(48.15%)
6. C Nick Cousins(77.22%)
7. RW Petr Straka(39.17%)
8. LW Tye McGinn(63.33%)
9. C/RW Jason Akeson(28.28%)
10. D Mark Alt(36.36%)
11. LW Marcel Noebels(45.31%)
12. D Oliver Lauridsen(40.38%)
13. LW Taylor Leier(36.84%)
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.

Click to read more...

 

[sobrien]

No clue at this point, but threw a bone to MAB, because we know he can be a 6-7 guy in the NHL if healthy.


After him, it'll be some conglomeration of Larsson, Wilcox, Konan, Parks, and Goulbourne for me. And maybe Johnston because I'm rooting for the kid.

 

[JVR21]

Sad to see how quickly Manning dropped.

 

[FlyersFan61290]

Manning, IMO MAB shouldn't be on the list.

 

[4thline4life]

Voted vasiliev. He's 19 and I think is playing in the khl. I think he has the skill but its a matter if he comes over.

 

[Hockeypete49]

I went with Mathers. The kid really wants to be a pro. I saw a interview he did and I was really impressed with him when he captained the Petes. Good Luck kid.

 

[LegionOfDoom91]

I went with Manning he's the only one left that I think might make something out of himself at the next level.

It's pretty much a dart board from here on out although Mathers & Goulbourne have better chances to make the NHL from the remaining guys but that has more to with their pugilistic skills than their actual talents.

 

[BernieParent]

You must all love Flanagan more than you do!!! I'm ordering you to!

Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan
Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan Flanagan

 

[BackToTheBrierePatch]

voted for Flanagan to make BP happy

 

[kelmitchell]

Honestly does anyone here think Manning will ever really be a pro?? IMO I think he's pretty bad lol

 

[CS]

Honestly does anyone here think Manning will ever really be a pro?? IMO I think he's pretty bad lol

He's better than Lauridsen.

 

[OzFlyers]

You must all love Flanagan more than you do!!!

Agreed. I think (hope) Kyle Flanagan could surprise all of us like Reader! I think he could jump them all and get a place on the third-fourth line after a couple of injuries.

 

[Jray42]

Manning >>> Lauridsen

 

[Patrick Division]

Manning, IMO MAB shouldn't be on the list.

I agree with this. I voted MAB just so I can get his name off of the list of choices.

BTW We have some good players in our system!!

 

[sobrien]

I agree with this. I voted MAB just so I can get his name off of the list of choices.

BTW We have some good players in our system!!

wut?


the top 3?

 

[DrinkFightFlyers]

BTW We have some good players in our system!!

Outside of Laughton, Haag, and Morin (and Ghost depending on who you talk to), most of the Flyers prospects are pretty low-end. Mostly bottom-line, bottom-pair, fringe NHLers.

 

[sa cyred]

Outside of Laughton, Haag, and Morin (and Ghost depending on who you talk to), most of the Flyers prospects are pretty low-end. Mostly bottom-line, bottom-pair, fringe NHLers.

Honestly though, overall, compared to other teams, we arent that bad. I think there is a HUGE misconception where our pipline sucks and everyone else has great ones. Other then a few teams that have sucked constently the past few years and built it up, most teams have 3-4 real good prospects, a few projects, a few raw players, and a few low ceiling/AHL guys.

Not saying we are the top prospect team, but I also dont think we are the worse.

 

[Broad Street Elite]

Honestly though, overall, compared to other teams, we arent that bad. I think there is a HUGE misconception where our pipline sucks and everyone else has great ones. Other then a few teams that have sucked constently the past few years and built it up, most teams have 3-4 real good prospects, a few projects, a few raw players, and a few low ceiling/AHL guys.

Not saying we are the top prospect team, but I also dont think we are the worse.

Not to mention the number of players already in the NHL under the age of 25. Prospect pool is definitely impacted by guys like Couturier/B.Schenn already being in the NHL and no longer being considered prospects.

The "low quality" of our system is certainly impacted by a decade of trading too many picks, but the situation is rapidly improving.

 

[Hockeypete49]

Honestly though, overall, compared to other teams, we arent that bad. I think there is a HUGE misconception where our pipline sucks and everyone else has great ones. Other then a few teams that have sucked constently the past few years and built it up, most teams have 3-4 real good prospects, a few projects, a few raw players, and a few low ceiling/AHL guys.

Not saying we are the top prospect team, but I also dont think we are the worse.

I agree. This organization is starting to stockpile some talent and hopefully some of these kids pan out and make the big club one day.

 

[BillyShoe1721]

There are still only one or two prospect pools that I wouldn't trade ours for, New Jersey and maybe Vancouver.

 

[sa cyred]

There are still only one or two prospect pools that I wouldn't trade ours for, New Jersey and maybe Vancouver.

Sharks? Avs have MacKinnon but after that really nothing. Canes? The Rangers also arent basking in prospect greatness.

I do think the Flyers having a "****** prospect line" is as overblown as the RedWings get credit for drafting. Well maybe not as bad but still pretty bad.

 

[CS]

There are still only one or two prospect pools that I wouldn't trade ours for, New Jersey and maybe Vancouver.

Prospect pools are as overrated as the pseudo-mythical "elite" goaltender. It's all BS.

Truth is that you'd be hard-pressed to find many 25 & under teams that you would move the Flyers' 25 & under roster for.

 

[jd2210]

Still MAB. If we are only going to 20 I'd say you'd be safe to stop adding players now.

 

[BillyShoe1721]

Sharks? Avs have MacKinnon but after that really nothing. Canes? The Rangers also arent basking in prospect greatness.

I do think the Flyers having a "****** prospect line" is as overblown as the RedWings get credit for drafting. Well maybe not as bad but still pretty bad.

I'd trade our entire prospect pool for MacKinnon. As for the Sharks, I'd take Hertl over Laughton, Mueller is about the same as Morin, Nieto is better than Cousins, then there's O'Regan, Tennyson, Abeltshauser...

Canes: Lindholm>Laughton, Murphy>Morin. Rangers have Kreider, Miller, Kristo, Fasth which is way better than our forwards, and McIlrath and Skjei on D. I'd definitely take them over ours.

 

[FlyTimmo]

I'd trade our entire prospect pool for MacKinnon.

Easily, easily. Lets see what we got. Laughton who projects to be at best a good second line two-way center. And potential top 4 d-man. And a raw 6-7 defensemen. Then all we have is some wildcards and some fringe NHLers.

Hell, I'd probably trade our entire prospect pool for Drouin or maybe Seth Jones and a young winger.