I see."about to" meaning all the talk about sucking for the next few years etc
There's certainly a risk-reward with going with the young guys. And it usually only works with high draft picks.
I see."about to" meaning all the talk about sucking for the next few years etc
The worse the older players get, the smaller the risk becomes.I see.
There's certainly a risk-reward with going with the young guys. And it usually only works with high draft picks.
I mean….this is pretty damning. Sadly.The worse the older players get, the smaller the risk becomes.
Our record has been just fine early on for the last 2 seasons when we've played more rookies. I mean for example Backstrom has missed the start of the both last 2 seasons. He played 39 games last season and 47 games the season before.
Our record in the last 82 games with him: 35-40-7 (77 points).
Our record in the last 82 games without him: 43-25-14 (100 points).
(I'm not saying Backstrom is the anchor that sinks this team but calculated the number using his numbers given he has missed the start of last 2 seasons and played the latter parts of the season)
Yeah, that's just really bad.I mean….this is pretty damning. Sadly.
I hope like hell that Nicky finds another gear this coming season (just one he’s had before), cause if not? It ain’t going to get much better.
That said, I DO wonder what’s a 3C Nick (PK and PP specialist) would look like. Get him off top 6 ES minutes, but certainly use him on special teams where speed is far less relevant, and hands/vision/puck sense are far more relevant.
It could work. He just needs to be prepared to change his approach.
Hey, I guess they can bench him if he wants to finish out the contract he earned and he doesn’t look somewhat better in camp.
That with/without record is anecdotal at best. I’d wager a deeper analysis would pick that apart, but who cares really? I wait to see how he looks when they report, then I’ll worry about it.
We did see those games though, and many of us pointed out the difference in speed and attitude