People people people....please.....
The thing about lists is that unless you understand how they were compiled they mean nothing. This is why simply posting the list as is creates such a ruckus in here. The article related to the list specifically stated that the list was created based on only the beginning of the hockey season. Therefore, no players who were injured at the beginning of the season were evaluated by the scouting peeps who made the list. That left anyone who had a pre-season injury pretty much off the list entirely.
Also, the article also specifically stated that the list had to be forwarded to the publisher prior to the 2006 WJC's...basically sometime in early December. So, none of the WJC performances were used for evaluations.