DMM, I just don't see how you can exclude Gaborik. Yeah, he missed a few games. But he still led his position in goals and was third in points despite playing with trash as line-mates and zero offensive support. His team's collection of talent beyond him and Lundqvist is pathetic. I can't use that against him. Don't get me wrong, because St. Louis had a great year, but I find Gaborik carrying the Rangers' offense within one skills competition victory of the playoffs pretty impressive. I mean, honestly, when the best center you've had all year is Erik freakin' Christensen, yet you still finish top five in goals and top ten in points, all while missing 6 games, 3 of which were due to a freak laceration, you deserve a post-season all-star nod.
Honestly, Patrick Kane just doesn't impress me like a first-team all-star should. His chronic floating and Pavel Bure-esque back-checking cost him in my book. I can't tell you how many times I see Kane floating in the neutral zone a few feet behind Toews, who is busy back-checking like his life depended on it.
Ovechkin-Crosby-Gaborik
Keith-Doughty
Miller
Parise-Sedin-Marleau
Pronger-Green
Bryzgalov
I'm fine with either Kane or Marleau, but Marleau's 44 goals are a) tops in the West by 5 (Heatley), and include 4 shorties give him my vote. My fandom might have played a role in it too.
Here's my problem with Lidstrom getting a spot. He didn't reach his typical elite level until after the Olympics. I tend to side with the guys who have been excellent for the entire season, so I agree with Pronger, or even Dan Boyle, who is quietly having a fantastic season despite getting no help from the atrocious Sharks' defense.
Posted via Mobile Device