That attitude is exactly how you get into this circle jerk. Nothing is a good choice when you systematically limit your choices to begin with.
The fix was indeed simple. When you see your organization trending in a certain direction, you cut loose and you "rebuild." You have to realize that signing guys in their mid 30's to 4 year extensions won't lead to anything good in the long run (and in this case, the short run)
Sometimes you do indeed just have to let guys go. It forces you to develop patience with your young players. It forces you to get out of your stupid comfort zone when it comes to the draft. Nurturing Despres instead of Engelland makes the Scuderi deal unnecessary. Having a little more patience with a replacement can lead to a Martin trade for a 1st rounder. The cap money left over can sign a much better top six FA forward AND bottom six forward.
There were ways to go about it, and they chose the worst possible one.
Funny thing is that Shero himself taught us these things in 07-11. It was HIS policy not to re-sign guys for more than a year at a time in their mid thirties. His whole draft strategy relied on playing young defenseman after drafting them, getting them to the level that they can replace your top 4 and then trading someone. Strange how success changes a man. Definitely for the worse.
1) Cutting Adams away 3 years ago would have been good timing. Below replacement level in every way. I think even OUR mgmt won't re-sign him, good on MJ for eventually getting him out of the lineup.
2) I thought Scuds was going to be a good signing, on the condition that Orpik was traded. If we had another genuine top 6 on top of what we've got, we could forgive them. He obviously needs to go, he makes it too hard on whoever is his partner and he costs too much. Have Cole - Lovejoy be the 3rd pairing. I'd be happy to cap dump Scuds but I think he has enough value that you can get a bottom 6 guy from a young team for him. He's definitely movable without taking salary back but we may only get a bottom 6er like Klinkhammer.
3) Kunitz can definitely be moved, unfortunately his value has been dying around the league with all the negative press. Last year you get an underperforming genuine top 6, this year not so much. If he has a good playoffs, he can probably be moved in an anti-Despres kind of move for someone with upside who has been "inconsistent". Hopefully a physical tweener who drives possession, scoring or not.
4) Sutter has the full backing of the Penguins Press behind him and seems to be viewed in a very positive light, even by the actually neutral sports media. He probably has more value than Kunitz and I wouldn't be surprised if you can get someone with top 6 potential that is at least NHL ready for him, especially if he has a good playoffs. Between Sunny and Spaling we can fill the 3C, but I'd be looking for a short term UFA 3C as well.
5) Lapierre is dead weight too, even as a 4th liner.
6) Bennett needs to be re-signed, Cole can be as long as it is cheap. I don't think he's any better than Doom and Harry except for his physical play though, but with Despres gone we need another body.
So I'd say if we moved them all we could get something like:
- Kunitz (3.85)
- Scuds (3.375)
- Adams (0.7)
- Sutter (3.3)
- Lapierre (1.2)
+ Physical tweener (1.5)
+ Young top 6 potential (0.9)
+ 4th line possessor (1.0M)
+ Dupuis? (3.75)
+ 5.225M cap space
No sure things, but a lot less dead weight