I was quite alarmed by iMac's appearance on Halford and Brough today, because I think it provides a window into ownership's thinking.
• Brough basically asked is it time to tear it down, and iMac went back to the "good young core" talking points of the Benning era, saying you already have these three guys, why wouldn't you want to build around them? No real acknowledgement of how impossible that is to do in the present cap situation, or really any doubt about them. It was very reminiscent of the defenses of Benning we saw here and elsewhere.
• Brough pushed back on the Big Three being good enough [I think this point is less important – obviously any good players contribute to winning and I don't really believe any group of good players "can't" win or improve when supplemented], but iMac once more did the optimistic-fan thing where he referred to the Edmonton bubble (sigh) and basically just assumed each player's best is what he will be (particularly for Demko – because of a gleam in his eye), rather than considering the full body of work, whether they could regress, whether many other teams have comparable "pieces", etc.
• Brough asked whether the Canucks have an explainable plan – iMac said the idea of a tear-down rebuild "has only been a thing in the last 10 years or so". Noting how no one ever talked about tear-downs in Pat Quinn's day, but rather he (and all GMs) simply just tried to make the team better bit by bit, through trades, coaching, development, etc.
I think the last part in particular is very worrisome. Yeah, no sh** in the pre-cap days teams just tried to accumulate as much talent as they could. There was no opportunity cost. The point of management has completely changed now, and the idea that (1) the Canucks can get significantly better without cap flexibility, or (2) this can be accomplished incrementally through Ethan Bear-type trades and better coaching techniques is exactly what I fear ownership thinks. "Ah, just a couple more baby steps." With no concept of the barriers they face. Because that's not how it worked in the '90s. (Hell, iMac even alluded to needing to draft players like Pettersson because you can't get them in trades...)