Hey all, first time long time...And I'm not sure where to vent, so hopefully this is ok! Anyway, I was reading through some GDT comments, like I always do after a game, and came across a couple posts about how Warsofsky was redundant, expendable, Krug lite, the wrong person to call up, etc... I was wondering if anyone had thoughts about that in regards to Eriksson and Bergeron?
I don't want to start off by bugging anyone, but does anyone else think that we probably should have gotten more out of Seguin? I mean, trading a 2nd overall, young, Stanley Cup winning stud should return something equally sought after, yeah? I can't help but feel tremendously underwhelmed by Eriksson. Understandably, he was injured and is learning a new system, but solid defensive and offensive board play, shooting the puck, and all out hustle and desire has more to do with individual instinctive skill more than the "system", right? Smith has been a great surprise(thank God), and didn't look like he had much trouble adjusting when he got here, hell, he's even having a career year with Boston's "super way hard to learn/ excuse for bad play system."
Even if he is just adjusting slowly, and coming back from his injuries, shouldn't we start seeing some form of excellence in his play- even just flashes of a potential first line RW? Because right now he looks and plays like a third line winger, and... I guess it just bums me out, ha. Not that I wanted to keep Seguin, just that I think that we could have done better.
So, I was under the impression that we were in a small window to win now, and I just think that we could have gotten a legitimate first line winger for someone with Seguin's value- not quality for quantity type thing. Thoughts? Go Bruins everyone!