Chinatown88
Daniels QB3
Last edited by a moderator:
we need to trade for Datsyuk.
Agreed. How many bad-decent prospects would it take?
the future superstar Jason Akeson probably gets it done maybe we toss in a couple of 2nd rounders for ***** and giggles
the future superstar Jason Akeson probably gets it done maybe we toss in a couple of 2nd rounders for ***** and giggles
Giroux's buddy is on pace for 82 goals next season. The real question should be, what's Detroit adding to that deal?
Akeson + our 2nd round picks from 2020-2030.
Haha. I wonder if something like that was actually offered how a GM would react. Ten second round picks is a lot of second round picks...
Islanders offered their entire draft for Murray and it got turned down. Not the same as 10 second rounders but still pretty hilarious.
phlocky said:Hmmm, I seem to remember Jester and I wanting us to sign Vokoun to a 2-3 years deal and let Bobrovsky develope. I guess maybe that would have been a good idea seeing how well Bob played for a CBJ team that was even worse defensively than we were this year. HMMMM
Somewhere, Jester is gut-laughing.
any news about Gagne?
Bill Meltzer recently wrote that he wouldn't be surprised if they use Gagne as more of a last resort type of option. For example, Holmer going after who he really wants, then if that doesn't pan out going for Gags. This makes sense to me. As personally, I am not as gung-ho on him being back as some of you.
If he's cheap he's the perfect bottom 6 forward. He still plays good defense, great speed and he can chip in goals.
Comparing him to most other bottom six forwards, he would be very expensive. That is assuming he gets something like 2.25-2.75m. Also, anything more than a 1 year deal might be a stretch.
I just read this article on Couts offense and thought it was pretty good. A fair bit of statistics suggesting him playing with better linemates would lead to much higher output. Many of you seem quite resistant to this suggestion.
http://www.broadstreethockey.com/20...rier-is-cool-please-dont-trade-him-for-yandle
Bill Meltzer recently wrote that he wouldn't be surprised if they use Gagne as more of a last resort type of option. For example, Holmer going after who he really wants, then if that doesn't pan out going for Gags. This makes sense to me. As personally, I am not as gung-ho on him being back as some of you.
so that means Homer will be over paying for Clarkson?