ColePens
RIP Fugu Buffaloed & parabola
A couple people were talking about what changes were made to the defensive system and I went back and watched part of the first two games again. Here is what I noticed (Remember.. it's only 2 games. Still too early to tell what is preached).
Gap Control
I know.. I talk about it way too much. But it's such an important factor in creating turnovers and going the other way for an offensive chance. I think the best way to show the difference between this year and last year is simply by the couple big Orpik hits. Last season - Martin, Orpik, and Michalek would back up almost all the way to their own zone and to the top of the circle. That is terrible. That allows entry into the zone, doesn't allow us to create turnovers in the grey area (right before/after the blue line), and creates no pressure. The only two that would be decent with gap control were Letang/Engo.
Through two games, it's been a breath of fresh air. You see them stepping up early and it's creating disruption of flow for the opposition, turnovers at the grey areas creating offensive chances, and as we see with Orpik huge hits. A quick note - the fact our forwards are coming back allows the defense to step up. The only way to truly gap up is when you have numbers on your side or are even 2-2/3-3. So kudos to guys like TK, Sutter, Dupers, Geno, etc. who are allowing our defense to feel comfortable stepping up.
Also remember, our defender does not have to get full contact of the guy by stepping up at the blue line. As long as he disrupts the flow, the other defender can slide over and take the puck or force an error. Or the backchecking forward can go full speed and cut off the lane that opened up. That's what we were doing in 2009.
Defensive zone aggression:
Not too much has changed in the defensive zone from what I can tell schematically. I still need more time to see how players react to specific situations. The big difference is aggression and guys like Sutter who actually know where to be and focus on their defensive game. I think it's most obvious in Paul Martin. He is all over guys as they enter the zone. He's poke checking and even being physical, albeit that he isn't the strongest guy. You can also see it with Despres and Engo how they are being physical and forcing mistakes.
Conclusion
This is just what I've seen in two games. It could be lucky coincidence or maybe this type of aggression sticks all season. You guys know I'd love it if we stay with this style of play. It works. It causes opponents to make mistakes and that sends us on our way in a quick transition. That's what we did in '09 and we have the offensive talent to make teams pay. We absolutely need to stay aggressive all over the ice. I'd prefer a man-to-man defense in our zone, but the aggression is still a better change.
Let's see where it takes us.
Video Breakdown
Just to see how this happens... Vitale (or is that TK?) tries to step up and cause disruption of flow in the neutral zone right by the red line. This changes the path of Krieder and the rest is history. If you also look, you have Cooke coming back for numbers and Orpik's defensive partner is already in transition of the "Switch" that defenders use when they step up early. Great gap - great aggression. Orpik didn't even have to smash him for this to work properly. The switch was engaged and we were back in transition to offense.
Gap Control
I know.. I talk about it way too much. But it's such an important factor in creating turnovers and going the other way for an offensive chance. I think the best way to show the difference between this year and last year is simply by the couple big Orpik hits. Last season - Martin, Orpik, and Michalek would back up almost all the way to their own zone and to the top of the circle. That is terrible. That allows entry into the zone, doesn't allow us to create turnovers in the grey area (right before/after the blue line), and creates no pressure. The only two that would be decent with gap control were Letang/Engo.
Through two games, it's been a breath of fresh air. You see them stepping up early and it's creating disruption of flow for the opposition, turnovers at the grey areas creating offensive chances, and as we see with Orpik huge hits. A quick note - the fact our forwards are coming back allows the defense to step up. The only way to truly gap up is when you have numbers on your side or are even 2-2/3-3. So kudos to guys like TK, Sutter, Dupers, Geno, etc. who are allowing our defense to feel comfortable stepping up.
Also remember, our defender does not have to get full contact of the guy by stepping up at the blue line. As long as he disrupts the flow, the other defender can slide over and take the puck or force an error. Or the backchecking forward can go full speed and cut off the lane that opened up. That's what we were doing in 2009.
Defensive zone aggression:
Not too much has changed in the defensive zone from what I can tell schematically. I still need more time to see how players react to specific situations. The big difference is aggression and guys like Sutter who actually know where to be and focus on their defensive game. I think it's most obvious in Paul Martin. He is all over guys as they enter the zone. He's poke checking and even being physical, albeit that he isn't the strongest guy. You can also see it with Despres and Engo how they are being physical and forcing mistakes.
Conclusion
This is just what I've seen in two games. It could be lucky coincidence or maybe this type of aggression sticks all season. You guys know I'd love it if we stay with this style of play. It works. It causes opponents to make mistakes and that sends us on our way in a quick transition. That's what we did in '09 and we have the offensive talent to make teams pay. We absolutely need to stay aggressive all over the ice. I'd prefer a man-to-man defense in our zone, but the aggression is still a better change.
Let's see where it takes us.
Video Breakdown
Just to see how this happens... Vitale (or is that TK?) tries to step up and cause disruption of flow in the neutral zone right by the red line. This changes the path of Krieder and the rest is history. If you also look, you have Cooke coming back for numbers and Orpik's defensive partner is already in transition of the "Switch" that defenders use when they step up early. Great gap - great aggression. Orpik didn't even have to smash him for this to work properly. The switch was engaged and we were back in transition to offense.