The second I saw the thread I knew it would be a North Division fan.
No one else wants to play the same few teams all season.
I don't want to go off topic too much but what are these "and a lot of other benefits not found in Canada."I am a Canadian, and even I don't want a Canadian team to be guaranteed a Final 4 berth every year.
Because whether people like it or not, Canadian NHL teams often lack quality compared to many American teams.
It makes sense, since a lot of American cities offer more attractive weather, better tax circumstances, and a lot of other benefits not found in Canada.
There is a reason a Canadian team hasn't won a Stanley Cup in 28 years, even though statistical probability indicates that they should have a 22.5% chance in any given year (7 teams out of 31 teams; higher than 22.5% before various league expansions during the last 28 years).
By granting a Canadian team an automatic Final 4 berth, you dilute the quality of the Final 4 more often than not, and cause some better teams to be eliminated earlier than they should be.
Many American cities present more marketing opportunities and more affordable cost-of-living.I don't want to go off topic too much but what are these "and a lot of other benefits not found in Canada."
I'll agree with the weather and taxes but can't think of any significant other ones.
The North division is garbage and it's a nonsensical idea to keep it going forward.
You're basically arguing the North division is good because it benefits Canadian teams by giving one of them a free ride to the conference finals, when they're not good enough to actually do that in normal divisions. The idea that Canadian teams deserve at least 1 team in the conference finals is asinine.
COUGH COUGH the pacific.I agree that we shouldn't keep this format, but it's not like Canadian teams are going to be bad forever. Every division will have up and down years.
There is a reason a Canadian team hasn't won a Stanley Cup in 28 years, even though statistical probability indicates that they should have a 22.5% chance in any given year (7 teams out of 31 teams; higher than 22.5% before various league expansions during the last 28 years).
By granting a Canadian team an automatic Final 4 berth, you dilute the quality of the Final 4 more often than not, and cause some better teams to be eliminated earlier than they should be.
Don't agree with the marketing opportunities and players get paid in American funds. That alone would make up for any perceived cost of living difference.Many American cities present more marketing opportunities and more affordable cost-of-living.
You want your Habs to keep this North Division bubble. I wonder why.
Probably had more to do with the Flames than the format. I understand the NHL holds amateur hour basically weekly but if you're a diehard that posts on HFboards odds are you're going to watch if your team is good. Unless you literally can't because of other responsibilities which has nothing to do with the NHL but is understandable.I can count the regular season games I watched on two hands. It would be even less it was another year of this.
Nah the game just isn't enjoyable under the bubble conferences. Interconference is sorely missed.Probably had more to do with the Flames than the format. I understand the NHL holds amateur hour basically weekly but if you're a diehard that posts on HFboards odds are you're going to watch if your team is good. Unless you literally can't because of other responsibilities which has nothing to do with the NHL but is understandable.
Not a fan of the restricted divisions, but I do like the idea of two game series in the same location, would simplify/reduce travel, especially for western conference teams. For Nashville the long west coast trips would be more efficient. To knock out btb's with Seattle and Vancouver, being able to play 4 consecutive games in close proximity would at least mirror lots of Eastern conference travel distances.
People want to watch playoff matchups that are relevant to their division.