generalshepherd141
Registered User
The Lightning have won the DiscoverCard Stanley Cup presented by Dunkin Donuts!This year divisions and helmets, next year jerseys and the Stanley cup
The Lightning have won the DiscoverCard Stanley Cup presented by Dunkin Donuts!This year divisions and helmets, next year jerseys and the Stanley cup
This year divisions and helmets, next year jerseys and the Stanley cup
How are these "desperate" financial times for these teams? desperate really?
According to Forbes, sales for tickets, suites, sponsorships, concessions, and parking account for more than 70% of total revenue usually.
What about slogans for these sponsors? LolThe Lightning have won the DiscoverCard Stanley Cup presented by Dunkin Donuts!
No, because they get paid to only have Coca Cola products instead of Pepsi.They aren't smart capitalists though, they are dumb, grubby ones. NHL brand and club brands have value, by slapping corporate logos all over it they are diminishing the value of these brand in exchange for quick $.
McDonalds' is a capitalist company, do you see them putting a Coca-Cola logo on their Golden Arches even though it would be worth many many millions?
No, because they get paid to only have Coca Cola products instead of Pepsi.
Interestingly in English football they went the other direction. For many years they had Barclay's as name sponsor for the Premier League, but they got rid of that in 2016 to have a cleaner brand. I think the reality was that it just wasn't enough money to justify that severe an impact on the brand. So that proves these things can be reversed.
League 1, La Liga and Serie A have league sponsors in the name. So it really depends on what management puts priority in. Seems like NHL is going the money route.
NHL management needs to watch Simon Sinek's Why Ted Talk. Maybe that will get them to understand that chasing money will only chase away fans in the process. While i am okay with this, i can understand why this may cause many people to turn away from the NHL. Every person has their limits before it becomes just too much.
Yep, the same year they removed the Barclays title sponsorship, the EPL's TV rights revenue increased by £2B, so they kinda could survive without itI think generally speaking the less money an entity has otherwise, the more open they will be to the short-term financial incentives provided by a sponsorship deal. In the case of the Premier League, their other sources of income dramatically increased over the years and so the perceived need for such sponsorship deals decreased.