You'd have to trade Volch, but if that contract is as bad as some express, not many teams would be willing to get him. We're stuck with him imo. I'm fine with having him though.
i'd much rather have volchenkov than all of tallinder, greene, fayne, and larsson who are all pretty much the same type of player. one of those 4 needs to go and it's certainly not going to be larsson.
Stay-at-home defensemen with Volchenkov's elite physical game (which is what we paid for, don't think it's not) are most certainly not easy to come by at the deadline.
imo, tallinder is the odd man out. the 2013-14 season will be quite interesting if even 2 of our defensive prospects pan out
On this I agree with you. About $3M of his salary was for his elite defense, about $1M of his salary was for his physicality. Right now we're not really getting either.I could really care less about his physical game when he's getting mercilessly burned by the likes of Sean Bergenheim.
Yup this is what I'm saying. A very good deal, but the kind of player we would want is probably a UFA soon or young RFA due a raise bigger than the one Fayne would get. I don't see it happening with the cap, and trying to take care of our own first.Fayne isn't off limits, but he's such a good value for the money he's paid, that it would have to be a very good deal to get him.
This is what I have said might happen if the season is wiped. Though I'd trade Tallinder for free, and re sign Zidlicky at $2.5 million for 2 years, or even Tallinder's salary for just the one. Zidlicky is more of a need right now.I tend to agree with Tallinder, however if this season is wiped, Zidlicky is off the books and Tallinder still has another year on the books, so the log jam may solve itself although I wouldn't be opposed to bringing Zidlicky back for 1-2 years at a reasonable price
To be fair I think he was injured of some kind. I can't believe he was that bad, and I can't believe he was left in the lineup, and Larsson wasn't inserted. He almost cost us the Florida series. The tying goal in game 7 was on him if I remember correctly too as well as many other goals. He pushed a Panther on Marty, and he couldn't make the save. He was coned by Bergenheim, and other Panthers time, and time again during that series. What pissed me off is Marty took a lot of blame for needing 7 games against Florida, but why weren't people calling out Volchenkov for the most part?I could really care less about his physical game when he's getting mercilessly burned by the likes of Sean Bergenheim.
Volchenkov wasn't really that bad at any point this season aside from the Florida series. That 7-game stretch he was awful, and people have based his entire tenure with the Devils on those 7 games. Completely ridiculous.
Volchenkov wasn't really that bad at any point this season aside from the Florida series. That 7-game stretch he was awful, and people have based his entire tenure with the Devils on those 7 games. Completely ridiculous.
Volchenkov wasn't really that bad at any point this season aside from the Florida series. That 7-game stretch he was awful, and people have based his entire tenure with the Devils on those 7 games. Completely ridiculous.
Not me. The CORSI obviously will tell us he was, but I remember the Fayne/Tallinder pairing being a trainwreck. Even feed me a stray cat admitted he was having a bad year. Fayne, and Tallinder on a pairing is bad news.This is exactly how I feel.
The people that base Volchenkov's demise on those 7 games are the same people that conveniently forget Tallinder was complete garbage in the 40 games before he was injured.
Tallinder has only been productive under Lemaire. He was awful under MacLean and aside from having fresh legs in the Cup finals, he was awful all of last year.