There are some contrasting artistic choices and statements that take away from the movie somewhat upon reflection. Namely, the movie is presented from multiple perspectives, yet they declare one perspective to be "The Truth." Further still, the opinion declared to be truthful is, ironically, the one that's most speculative (as it's the one perspective that's not actually written about historically, despite this movie being advertised and declared in the introduction to be based on true events). They also pull in some rather obvious nods to
recent history, sometimes so jarringly so that it takes the viewer out of the experience. I understand why they made many of these choices to attempt to deliver the message they want to deliver, and while I agree with that message, at times they flew completely by the point of any subtlety or nuance. They give the audience very little credit for being able to figure out this message on our own. Some of their attempts to beat this point into us just feel gratuitous.