but I’d like to at least see Korpi do this consistently against some quality opponents.
Well how exactly do you expect him do to that? And how would that affect your opinions on Bobby's playing time/starts?
Do some of you NOT see the problem with your logic? You say that Korpisalo
shouldn't start over Bobrovsky because he's supposedly never proven something he's
never had the opportunity
to prove.
AND REMEMBER, the initial "pro Bob" argument was that the team wouldn't/couldn't win games with Korpisalo. REALITY is that they
haven't lost a game with him this year. So now of course, the goal posts gets moved back and its all supposedly because the "quality of competition" between our goalies is vastly different. And are you saying/admitting that Bob cant handle the "tougher" teams? Or that Korpisalo should now get the opportunity to play these "tougher" teams? Or
neither?
And what's actually wrong with STL or FLA? How
bad actually are they? I guess we should just "all" be glad that
'games in hand' didn't suit up for FLA, he woulda LIT Korpisalo UP.
Can you imagine a GM asking Bob/his agent about his rough start/bad numbers/bad record, and them giving the excuse that he had to play the
tough teams. Talk about earning/deserving the big bucks, eh. I really must be missing something when the same people who claim Bob is a top 3 goalie in the league,
deserves to be paid (by the CBJ) top 3, and then gives him an excuse or 'out' when he not only loses or gets LIT UP against good teams, BUT LOOKS BRUTAL WHILE IT OCCURS.
"tough teams Bobrovsky"
or
"shit teams Korpisalo"
??