Al Bundy*
Guest
With the realignment for next season and new playoff format, I decided it would be a good time to bring up the old playoff format that the new one resembled.
From 1981-81 to 1992-93, the Stanley Cup Playoffs were done divisionally (top 4 teams per division got in regardless of record, play down to division champ, they meet in conference finals, then conference champs play for Cup).
Looking back, it was a playoff format that had its positives and negatives
Positives
Built up intense rivalries- Battles of Alberta, Quebec, New York, plus all the intense Norris Division showdowns in the 80s
Unpredictability- at least one fourth-place team upset a division champ in round each year save for 1992 (and even that year, two of them had to come back from a 3-1 series deficit)
Negatives
Divisional predictability- A lot of things didn't change year in and year out. Montreal and Boston met 9 straight years in the Adams Division (5 of them in the division finals), which made it hard for Sabre and Whaler fans back then. Also save for the '82 Canucks and '93 Kings, the Smythe Division participant in the conference finals came from the province of Alberta, which probably didn't set well with Winnipeg, which had good team's but was stuck in the wrong division for them way back when. Also, it led to conference final mismatches- only twice did the Norris Division make it to the Cup Finals in this era.
Mediocrity sometimes rewarded- unlike recently, some of the lower ranked playoff teams with win-loss records didn't have stellar win-loss records, which created interesting situations (1982 and 1991 Campbell Conference Finals were contested between teams that did not have a winning record), and some of them went deep into the playoffs (1982 Canucks, 1984 Habs, 1986 Rangers, 1991 North Stars all made it to round 3 even though they had less than stellar records.
What were your thoughts on this playoff format?
From 1981-81 to 1992-93, the Stanley Cup Playoffs were done divisionally (top 4 teams per division got in regardless of record, play down to division champ, they meet in conference finals, then conference champs play for Cup).
Looking back, it was a playoff format that had its positives and negatives
Positives
Built up intense rivalries- Battles of Alberta, Quebec, New York, plus all the intense Norris Division showdowns in the 80s
Unpredictability- at least one fourth-place team upset a division champ in round each year save for 1992 (and even that year, two of them had to come back from a 3-1 series deficit)
Negatives
Divisional predictability- A lot of things didn't change year in and year out. Montreal and Boston met 9 straight years in the Adams Division (5 of them in the division finals), which made it hard for Sabre and Whaler fans back then. Also save for the '82 Canucks and '93 Kings, the Smythe Division participant in the conference finals came from the province of Alberta, which probably didn't set well with Winnipeg, which had good team's but was stuck in the wrong division for them way back when. Also, it led to conference final mismatches- only twice did the Norris Division make it to the Cup Finals in this era.
Mediocrity sometimes rewarded- unlike recently, some of the lower ranked playoff teams with win-loss records didn't have stellar win-loss records, which created interesting situations (1982 and 1991 Campbell Conference Finals were contested between teams that did not have a winning record), and some of them went deep into the playoffs (1982 Canucks, 1984 Habs, 1986 Rangers, 1991 North Stars all made it to round 3 even though they had less than stellar records.
What were your thoughts on this playoff format?
Last edited by a moderator: