hisgirlfriday
Moderator
- Jun 9, 2013
- 16,742
- 184
Sounds like Allen will start for them but they are very close to signing Brodeur.
The hawks look great but both la/ana/edm were playing like ass with significantly more depleted rosters then we were and Vancouver/ brought a much tighter game than either of them. We just won the game we had circled on our calenders but this is a game STL always circles on theirs. Wednesday will tell us more about our team than the wins in socal. First game back after huge trip, division rival. This is going to be the toughest game yet
I agree. Against Kings/Ducks, we looked fantastic, but deceivingly so, as the ops weren't very good at all. TBH, I will be hopng Hawks don't have the inevitable letdown back home after a fine road trip but if it was offered right now, I'd take a loser point.
The hawks look great but both la/ana/edm were playing like ass with significantly more depleted rosters then we were and Vancouver/ brought a much tighter game than either of them. We just won the game we had circled on our calenders but this is a game STL always circles on theirs. Wednesday will tell us more about our team than the wins in socal. First game back after huge trip, division rival. This is going to be the toughest game yet
We are on a Hawks message board where most of us discuss every aspect of the team and organization as well as every game. We aren't normal run-of-the-mill fans so I don't think most of us will ever take that approach to the team (i.e. not getting too invested because face it, almost all of us already are).
That being said it would behoove of people to tone down the negativity.
If we lost to the Kings or Ducks it would mean the world and shows the Hawks aren't a good team.
If we win against the Ducks or Kings, it doesn't mean much at all, and we still have to prove ourselves vs the Blues.
//Bobbys world.
You need to comment more on hockey and less with personal crap.
But I must ask. Forget the Hawks for a second, do you think Ducks and Kings were anywhere close to their best on the weekend? Yes or no?
It certainly would be nice to discuss hockey logically and honestly without some of you folks getting your shorts in a knot.
Pretty much. There's a few snobbish experts that love to lecture about the finer points of the game or whatnot, but they look pretty silly grasping at the thinnest straws to downplay or discredit the Hawks. Every year there's a new flaw, whether it be faceoffs, the PP, PK, holding leads, the 6th D-man, the 4th line LW, not playing someone's favorite pet rookie, effort (LOL), etc that will lead to the Hawks downfall, and when they aren't the 1 team out of 30 that wins the Cup they parade around here about how _______ cost the Hawks the Cup.If we lost to the Kings or Ducks it would mean the world and shows the Hawks aren't a good team.
If we win against the Ducks or Kings, it doesn't mean much at all, and we still have to prove ourselves vs the Blues.
//Bobbys world.
Yes I do. They didn't have full rosters but neither did we. You're not discussing hockey logically, just frequently looking for flaws and rarely being satisfied.
You need to comment more on hockey and less with personal crap.
But I must ask. Forget the Hawks for a second, do you think Ducks and Kings were anywhere close to their best on the weekend? Yes or no?
It certainly would be nice to discuss hockey logically and honestly without some of you folks getting your shorts in a knot.
That's a rough way to be a fan man. We are unquestionably, with ZERO doubt, fans of one of the best teams in the NHL. Despite that, our team isn't going to be perfect. Whether it's over the course of a season or even a single game. I personally don't know how you can watch the games that way and still get enjoyment out of the Hawks.
It's a long season Bobby! Just sit back and enjoy the little things as they come, there'll be a lot of them
I loved Saturday night's game. Still pumped up from it.
Don't be. The Kings weren't at their best.