kolanos
Registered User
- Nov 7, 2003
- 1,515
- 0
I think it is more intended to show the disparity between the team salaries 1994-present.nyr7andcounting said:Whoever made that graph is clearly unstable. Atleast use a bar graph if your going to have that many different elements in it.
Actually, the creator of the graph is correct. You always use a line graph to indicate trends. Bar graphs should never be used to show this due to the inaccuarcies in viewing it......the creator should have subdivided it into sub-graphs though to make it easier on the eyes.nyr7andcounting said:Whoever made that graph is clearly unstable. Atleast use a bar graph if your going to have that many different elements in it.
yea, pitt had the highest payroll around 1992-93.nyr7andcounting said:shows that some teams have come into the league and have never really improved financially and shows some teams that have gone from top to bottom. Look at Pitt, almost #1 in 94, if not #1 I can't tell, and now they are right down near the bottom.
I think this just shows that until the bottom markets improve their revenues, theres no where for the league to go. Hopefully there situation improves soon, hopefully this cap will help that a little.