Well, that's what I am talking about: raw numbers and more raw numbers.
If you compare their % leads over #5 in points, it is dead-even at 18%.
If you compare % leads over #10 in points, it is McD easily 33-26.
If you compare % of points that are not on PP, it is McD easily 73-49
If you compare % of primary points in their total points, it is McD 74-71
Yes, it is mainly splitting hairs and the seasons are close, but this is exactly my point - how is one #7 and another #22?
And why compare 1st with 10th and 5th exactly? Seems a little bit arbitrary to me to chose random placing.
Runners-up are more relevant in this case imo. Crosby had a 0,13 PPG lead over Thornton (Runner-up) which was way more significant than McDavid’s 0,03 PPG lead over Crosby.
Plus, Crosby in 2007 was way more ahead of his competition throughout the season (points wise and PPG wise) while McDavid and Crosby in 2017 were switching back and fourth first and second place (with Crosby playing 7 less games). It wasn’t until the last month of the season that McDavid started to separate himself (even though it was a mere lead).
Let’s not forget that Crosby (2006-07) was clearly viewed as the best player in the world throughout the season. He was able to make that separation from his peers at such a young age, while it wasn’t the case for McDavid in 2017, Crosby was still the consensus best in the world by the end of the season and by the start of the 2017-18 season.
You made good points though about McDavid having more primary points (slightly) and a better EV strength production, but it’s not enough to outweigh was Crosby did that season. Crosby still had a better and more impressive sophomore season overall than McDavid.