Team Board Dispersal Draft - Pick #12

[BrooklynCapsFan]

Martin Skoula

 

[capitalsrock]

In all seriousness, Jonathan Quick

 

[blokeyhighlander]

Schultz.

Big vet D man with cup-winning experience.

Also not difficult on the eyes.

 

[HunterSThompson]

Guy tries to do something kind of cool, very time consuming, and definitely interesting once all is said and done, and Caps fans go out of their way to make it much more difficult for not only him but yourselves. Is this fanbase full of hipsters?

 

[DCRedhawk21]

Last year the main boards taught me how important plus/minus is when evaluating a player. So Jeff Schultz.

 

[Carlzner]

Guy tries to do something kind of cool, very time consuming, and definitely interesting once all is said and done, and Caps fans go out of their way to make it much more difficult for not only him but yourselves. Is this fanbase full of hipsters?

He never said he's coming in peace.

 

[The Deadly Pook Gas]

Guy tries to do something kind of cool, very time consuming, and definitely interesting once all is said and done, and Caps fans go out of their way to make it much more difficult for not only him but yourselves. Is this fanbase full of hipsters?

I don't see what the big deal is. We already lost anyways. Its a public opinion poll on HFboards and we don't have captain clutch or cindy.

 

[RandyHolt]

Other: Write in Candidate, Jeffrey "da Bench Texter" Schultz

Seriously: Huge. Chara Upside. Has a Ring. Wing Span of a Giant Moth. We can't lose on this.

 

[tycoonheart]

Yes, yes, gotta vote for my man Plus Fiddy.

 

[BobRouse]

Count me in for Schultz!

 

[HunterSThompson]

I don't see what the big deal is. We already lost anyways. Its a public opinion poll on HFboards and we don't have captain clutch or cindy.

I don't think it is a big deal which is why it makes more sense to just vote for somebody rather than derail what this guy is trying to do (and no I am not saying this is your fault as the first Schultz proponent, more the parrots). I took it as which fanbase would draft the best team BTW. Let's all conform to nonconformity.

 

[BobRouse]

I don't think it is a big deal which is why it makes more sense to just vote for somebody rather than derail what this guy is trying to do (and no I am not saying this is your fault as the first Schultz proponent, more the parrots). I took it as which fanbase would draft the best team BTW. Let's all conform to nonconformity.

Are you suggesting Jeff Schultz is not a good option???

Ummm...he won a Stanley Cup last year and another year led the NHL with a +50.

You've been around long enough to see all the Ovechkin vs Crosby threads right?

They end with Pens fans posting pics of Crosby holding the cup and everyone else saying Ovechkin is terrible b/c he was a -35. The talking heads even suggest this on TV all the time.

SC and leading +/- = PROFIT!

I support this message.

 

[Ajax1995]

Personally I'm not voting because of the travishamockery of a claim that the Leaves fans got the first pick by 'random'...

 

[HunterSThompson]

stickittothemaneosis

 

[BobRouse]

Personally I'm not voting because of the travishamockery of a claim that the Leaves fans got the first pick by 'random'...

Well the Leaves have a far sadder record than even the Caps. Their fans have to feel like they can win something...anything...

Oh and Hunter...

I'm sporting my skinny jeans and working on my laptop at Starbucks drinking a latte.

 

[HunterSThompson]

I'm sporting my skinny jeans and working on my laptop at Starbucks drinking a latte.

I can see your unkempt hair and beard from here.

 

[Hivemind]

In all seriousness, Jonathan Quick

Ignoring that you shouldn't invest that heavily in a goalie while building a team, how anyone picks Quick over Rask is beyond me.

 

[Halpysback*]

Ignoring that you shouldn't invest that heavily in a goalie while building a team, how anyone picks Quick over Rask is beyond me.

Because he's on a whole other level than the laughably overrated Rask perhaps?

 

[Burakovsky95*]

Because he's on a whole other level than the laughably overrated Rask perhaps?

That's kinda ridiculous. They're both very good goalies but I still take Rask. Quick has had one spectacular regular season with several mediocre ones and he's really only known for his playoff prowess which wasn't present last postseason.

 

[BackToTheBasics]

Because he's on a whole other level than the laughably overrated Rask perhaps?

Lundqvist is better than both. Best goalie in the world.

 

[Blades of Steel]

I'd take Quick over Rask 1000 times in a row without thinking twice.

 

[Burakovsky95*]

I'd take Quick over Rask 1000 times in a row without thinking twice.

Based off of?

 

[Blades of Steel]

Based off of?

well... what year do you want?

 

[AlexBrovechkin8]

Mark me down for Donald Brashear.

 

[Halpysback*]

That's kinda ridiculous. They're both very good goalies but I still take Rask. Quick has had one spectacular regular season with several mediocre ones and he's really only known for his playoff prowess which wasn't present last postseason.

Quick had a great playoffs last year, just not world-beating. Rask has been slightly better in the regular season behind the best defensive team in the NHL that gets/got to play in a comparatively weak EC division, and his game goes down a notch in the playoffs. Quick has two cups and a WSF sandwich in between them and he was the best player on his team 2 out of those 3 years.