Confirmed with Link: Tannenbaum to sell a portion of his shares of MLSE holdings to OMERS

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
79,389
54,951
I believe the evaluation was 8 Billion USD for the whole thing. 2 Billion USD would be the sale price.

Oh ok I just re-read the Rick Westhead tweet. Yeah, $8 billion enterprise value seems a bit low.
 

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
40,686
10,747
Wonder what portion of that growth is the 200% increase in the 2016 NBA media deal.

He is apparently selling part of his 25%, not all of it.
Oh I didn't know that, maybe he wants to settle debt etc. Probably thinks he can sell 20%, keep 5% and still control the show in agreement/partnership with OMERS.

These complicated arrangements are why the teams a basketcase though.

They don't really need to since together they own over 50% and they're contractually obligated to vote the same way.

Right they have closed door fits between the two parties. I bet those meetings are heated
 

justashadowof

Registered User
Aug 15, 2020
4,025
4,229
I still say the inevitable outcome of this Bell/Rogers joint ownership will be a split resulting in a second team in Toronto. And I bet it just happens out of the blue. Gary Bettman (or his successor) will hold a press conference announcing a Toronto expansion team with the ownership already worked out behind the scenes.
 

JT AM da real deal

Registered User
Oct 4, 2018
12,246
7,611
Why wouldn't Bell and Rogers buy this stake once a valuation is established?
That is da right question .. my guess Larry already approached at his number on his same terms and there was no interest so he waited out da timing clause on them .. he must be liquidating for health reasons/family estate planning and he choose OMERS as partner as Kilmer works with them on several real estate plays already and together they still control mlse
 

OddyOh

Really, Healy?
Aug 18, 2010
412
375
Regina, SK
I still say the inevitable outcome of this Bell/Rogers joint ownership will be a split resulting in a second team in Toronto. And I bet it just happens out of the blue. Gary Bettman (or his successor) will hold a press conference announcing a Toronto expansion team with the ownership already worked out behind the scenes.
I wouldn't call it inevitable, but I like where your head’s at. Rogers gets the new team, Bell gets the Leafs, and let the team with the best broadcasts (and on ice product of course) win! :)
 

keonsbitterness

Registered User
Sep 14, 2010
35,388
18,770
south of Steeles
I still say the inevitable outcome of this Bell/Rogers joint ownership will be a split resulting in a second team in Toronto. And I bet it just happens out of the blue. Gary Bettman (or his successor) will hold a press conference announcing a Toronto expansion team with the ownership already worked out behind the scenes.
I hope not. 32 is too many teams as it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thewave

many76

Registered User
Sep 20, 2014
17
6
I wonder if Larry was actively looking to sell a piece of his share or Omers came to him, if he was actively trying could he have found a wealthy person to buy instead a soulless corrupt pension plan
 

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
40,686
10,747
I wonder if Larry was actively looking to sell a piece of his share or Omers came to him, if he was actively trying could he have found a wealthy person to buy instead a soulless corrupt pension plan

What difference would it make. The two soulless telecom and media giants have the majority anyways. It's not like they actually care when they are mostly worried about the corporate images of the parent companies. The team itself always profits, that's the beauty of this lazy investment for Bell and Rogers. It's a printing press.
 

TheDoldrums

Registered User
May 3, 2016
12,273
18,383
Kanada
I still say the inevitable outcome of this Bell/Rogers joint ownership will be a split resulting in a second team in Toronto. And I bet it just happens out of the blue. Gary Bettman (or his successor) will hold a press conference announcing a Toronto expansion team with the ownership already worked out behind the scenes.

I hope we get Bell in the divorce I guess
 
  • Like
Reactions: saffronleaf

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
74,300
40,218
I wonder if Larry was actively looking to sell a piece of his share or Omers came to him, if he was actively trying could he have found a wealthy person to buy instead a soulless corrupt pension plan
Yeah, Melnyks daughters might be looking to get back in.

Have you found MLSE to be on the cheap side?
 

Mckay

I find your lack of gravy disturbing.
Mar 5, 2014
659
469
Canada
As a member of OMERS, I think it’s neat that a tiny portion of the sale price will be with my money.
 

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
41,394
33,293
St. Paul, MN
I don’t know if we need a 3-5 year rebuild in the near future.

I don’t know if a rebuild would be financially damaging to the Leafs other than lost playoff revenue.

I don’t know if your year to year hockey related revenue even for the Leafs is proportional to franchise and conglomerate level valuations.

Just given the scale of the money involved the hockey stuff just doesn’t seem like a big deal.

Don't undercut prestige to a corporate board. Nobody in their position wants to say they own a losing team.

There's a reason why we've only seen one through the draft rebuild in multiple decades in this city. I
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
79,389
54,951
Don't undercut prestige to a corporate board. Nobody in their position wants to say they own a losing team.

There's a reason why we've only seen one through the draft rebuild in multiple decades in this city. I

Eh, I think a rebuild is just like anything else. You just have to sell it to your fanbase and frame it the right way and hopefully you have the right personality to push it to the board.
 

Squiffy

Victims, rn't we all
Oct 21, 2006
13,764
3,538
Toronto
$8 billion and this team has a problem with firing coaches and paying out their contracts? SN and TSN have to provide an inferior product while laying off talent and staff? This whole team, from ownership down to its core four are so f***ing unlikeable.
I mean, these things don’t really go together. BCE (and Rogers) and their long term strategy for media assets are not related to their MLSE holdings. In the least.

For the other part, not spending money on the team is not a legitimate complaint to lob against MLSE.
 

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
40,686
10,747
I mean, these things don’t really go together. BCE (and Rogers) and their long term strategy for media assets are not related to their MLSE holdings. In the least.

For the other part, not spending money on the team is not a legitimate complaint to lob against MLSE.

The leafs spend the most because operating expenses go against what they give to the league from their profits. Pretty certain on that. So it's like, we can have the best and more of everything or just give more to Arizona so they can get more of what you're not allowed to keep lol

Basically we do it to keep more of our fans money in Canada rather than subsidize the US teams.
 

Squiffy

Victims, rn't we all
Oct 21, 2006
13,764
3,538
Toronto
I mean I’d disagree on the motivation there, but either way, the end result is the same right? For whatever complaints we have about MLSE, and there’s no shortage, spending on the team isn’t a legit one.
 

TMLBlueandWhite

Registered User
Feb 2, 2023
1,371
1,443
Given the choice between selling the team and firing his friends, it appears Tanenbaum has chosen to sell the team.

It looks like this geriatric billionaire has given up on the dream of winning a cup. It really is all about the money. If he actually cared about winning the cup he would have done what's right for the team, the fans, and the city of Toronto itself.

Fire everyone from Shanahan on down.

Instead the clown car calamity known as the Toronto Maple Leafs continues to give fans a kick in the nuts.

Is OMERS buying part of the team because they want to bring a Stanley Cup to Toronto? Is that really why they are interested in becoming part owners? To win a Stanley Cup?

I'd really like to see their CEO look in a camera and say that with a straight face.

I understand hockey is a business. And businesses are in business to make money. Not to win cups.

They only care about you as much as your landlord does.

But at some point you would think somebody in the organization would remember they were a sports team still. Maybe even think about doing what's right for the fans. And for the city of Toronto itself.

We're the ones paying for it all.
 

al secord

Mustard Tiger
Jun 26, 2013
12,285
14,218
Toronto
That would be great but I don't think the lack of an NFL team here has anything to do with money.
I'm not up on NFL governance, but wouldn't he have to cut ties with MLSE in order to own an NFL team. My understanding is that they only allow for individual ownership.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACC1224

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad