Prospect Info: Tampa Bay Lightning prospect rankings 2014 - #10

[Necropolis]

The winner of poll #9 - Adam Erne

13-14 STATS

| GP | Goals | Assists | Points
Regular season (QMJHL) | 48 | 21 | 41 | 62
Playoffs (QMJHL) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1
Regular season (AHL) | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4

Tampa Bay Lightning prospect rankings 2014

1. Jonathan Drouin (90.91%)
2. Andrei Vasilevskiy (93.81%)
3. Nikita Kucherov (63.27%)
4. Slater Koekkoek (66.67%)
5. Anthony DeAngelo (43.48%)
6. Brett Connolly (33.33%)
7. Andrej Sustr (40.48%)
8. Vladislav Namestnikov (67.57%)
9. Adam Erne (78.57%)

Click to read more...

 

[Jacko95]

Looking at that top10 is just amazing. Seeing that Masin a 18 year old high 2nd rounder has trouble making our top10 is crazy. Especially after all those graduations and while having such a promising roster

That said my pick here is Masin, but it was close with Gudlevskis. I just think Masin is a little better prospect.

 

[chasespace]

Special K then Mean Masin.

 

[HoseEmDown]

I'm the only one thinking Paquette? Think he could be a good 3rd liner if he improves his skating with 20-20 ability. If not he could been an elite 4th liner. I like Masin but Paquette is the more sure thing, Masin could become a good middle pair but is a few years out.

 

[DFC]

I'm the only one thinking Paquette? Think he could be a good 3rd liner if he improves his skating with 20-20 ability. If not he could been an elite 4th liner. I like Masin but Paquette is the more sure thing, Masin could become a good middle pair but is a few years out.

I like Paquette a lot. I agree that he's pretty much a sure-thing, which I think makes up for scoring potential, which is never quite sure. That said, I went with Gudlevskis. I thought he was outstanding in his NHL appearances and his AHL numbers were dragged down a bit by a weak defense. He looks like a sure NHLer too, to me, the only question is whether or not he can be a starter, and he might be.

 

[HoseEmDown]

I like Paquette a lot. I agree that he's pretty much a sure-thing, which I think makes up for scoring potential, which is never quite sure. That said, I went with Gudlevskis. I thought he was outstanding in his NHL appearances and his AHL numbers were dragged down a bit by a weak defense. He looks like a sure NHLer too, to me, the only question is whether or not he can be a starter, and he might be.

Gudlevskis is too inconsistent for me, don't think he'll ever become a 1a but can be a 1b. Paquette seems like a player who'll be in the league awhile as a solid bottom 6er. Gudlevskis might become more consistent and become a starter but right now I'd prefer the guy who'll play every game then a backup goalie.