Structure of Team Canada

Discussion in 'International Tournaments' started by chicpea*, Jan 5, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
View Users: View Users
  1. chicpea*

    chicpea* Guest

    One thing that should be added and I would like your comments on: I thought Team Canada's overall structure was excellent this year and with the exception of an Ian White type for the power play, I wouldn't change a thing for next year. I think 03/04 was a huge improvement over 02/03 and previous years. We were not only solid, but better and better each game. We all now what happened today, so please don't let a bad goal cloud your opinions.
     
  2. CharlieGirl

    CharlieGirl Thank you Mr. Snider

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    30,538
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kitchener, ON
    Home Page:
    I agree completely - the team that was selected was the best group of players. Had they continued to play their game through the third period, we'd be celebrating the gold medal. Unfortunately, they stopped banging and crashing early in the 3rd and let the USA play their game.

    I wouldn't change anything either - next year's team should look very much like this one, with the addition of a goaltender, a physical presence to replace Paille, and a powerplay specialist on defense. Canada was able to roll four lines who could score, forecheck, and shut down the opposing team.
     
  3. strungout

    strungout Professional Killer Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    31,705
    Likes Received:
    593
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    Maryland
    Fehr should be a welcome addition (should have been this year)
     
  4. John Agar

    John Agar The 4th Hanson Bro'

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    7,458
    Likes Received:
    2,115
    Trophy Points:
    201
    Occupation:
    A Bridge between Worlds
    Location:
    Winnipeg, Manitoba
    Fehr, Brodziak instead of...

    Jeremy Colliton might have made a difference.

    I like Colliton as a player in the WHL. He has a future in pro as a role player - but...Canada needed more finishers in the crunch (ie. USA game). Jeremy was never a threat in this game and there is no one that can say Brodziak or Fehr would not/could not have adapted to the role player role.

    That's my story...and I'm stickin' to it. :D
     
  5. Ticallion961

    Ticallion961 Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    480
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Nova Scotia
    not sure i agree, Canada put up an awful lot of goals, don't think they needed more finishers. I would have got rid of Dixon for Fehr though...Dixon had a tough tournament in a limited role
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"