ILikeItILoveIt
Registered User
- Apr 2, 2010
- 823
- 617
What??!!? Trade the future franchise D-man? Isn't he untouchable?
Why should he be?
We have too many good d-men and not enough good forwards. So we should trade a strength to get a strength.
Why Seth?
Because he'd bring back the best bounty of talent for the least amount of "results-sacrificed" short-to-medium term.
Lets face it, Seth was our 5th best D-man this year. He had his moments but he was -23 and made a ton of mistakes. He'll clean that up in time and probably become a very good player.
His valuation right now is as a future player. His upside is huge. On our current team, he's redundant. We can play Webs-Josi-Ellis-MDZ at the points on the PP. Mathias and Bartley are as good if not better than Seth right now. Yes, Seth will pass them in the future, but for next year, not having Seth Jones (vintage 2013) doesn't hurt us.
We could get an elite forward for Jones. That elite forward would instantly be our best player. Now we'd have an elite goalie, elite D-man, AND an elite forward.
The Wild are still playing because they have Parise. Yes Suter is elite, but you can't win in this league without an elite forward.
As long as our acquired forward was young enough, and the valuation of the trade was fair, then we couldn't lose. If last year's draft didn't get bleeped up, we'd have Barkov right now instead of Seth.
Hypothetically, would you trade Seth for Barkov even up right now? I would, and maybe Florida would too. Who knows. Everybody is looking to shuffle their cards when they're not winning to change the dynamic.
I'm not trading him because he's a disappointment. He's the best trade-bait because his market value exceeds his current value. Josi is the exact opposite. His current value to the Preds exceeds his market value on the street. Take Josi off of next year's team, and you have a big time hole that you can only hope Jones could fill.
So, lets light up the NHL trade market and trade Jones to fire up our "O".
Who's with me??????
Why should he be?
We have too many good d-men and not enough good forwards. So we should trade a strength to get a strength.
Why Seth?
Because he'd bring back the best bounty of talent for the least amount of "results-sacrificed" short-to-medium term.
Lets face it, Seth was our 5th best D-man this year. He had his moments but he was -23 and made a ton of mistakes. He'll clean that up in time and probably become a very good player.
His valuation right now is as a future player. His upside is huge. On our current team, he's redundant. We can play Webs-Josi-Ellis-MDZ at the points on the PP. Mathias and Bartley are as good if not better than Seth right now. Yes, Seth will pass them in the future, but for next year, not having Seth Jones (vintage 2013) doesn't hurt us.
We could get an elite forward for Jones. That elite forward would instantly be our best player. Now we'd have an elite goalie, elite D-man, AND an elite forward.
The Wild are still playing because they have Parise. Yes Suter is elite, but you can't win in this league without an elite forward.
As long as our acquired forward was young enough, and the valuation of the trade was fair, then we couldn't lose. If last year's draft didn't get bleeped up, we'd have Barkov right now instead of Seth.
Hypothetically, would you trade Seth for Barkov even up right now? I would, and maybe Florida would too. Who knows. Everybody is looking to shuffle their cards when they're not winning to change the dynamic.
I'm not trading him because he's a disappointment. He's the best trade-bait because his market value exceeds his current value. Josi is the exact opposite. His current value to the Preds exceeds his market value on the street. Take Josi off of next year's team, and you have a big time hole that you can only hope Jones could fill.
So, lets light up the NHL trade market and trade Jones to fire up our "O".
Who's with me??????