Broz is most valued piece in deal tho, why would they want an undersized winger in Puustinen. They want the young C w Top 6 upside.I like the basis here but I think San Jose would want more here. With that being said, I also don't really know what else the Penguins can feasibly add here to get San Jose to agree to this. Broz is a solid prospect, not anything too crazy but a solid prospect. I just think Broz, a 2nd and swapping Blackwood for Jarry doesn't seem like quite enough for Ferraro, but maybe I'm overvaluing Ferraro.
Replace Broz with Puustinen and I think this could be something that could work.
Broz is most valued piece in deal tho, why would they want an undersized winger in Puustinen. They want the young C w Top 6 upside.
This isn’t good at all for SJ. Broz is meh, Jarry is a cap dump at best for SJ so it’s a 2nd for their best LHD and a guy the locker room loves and a good goalie.
I'll correct myself, they dont want a severely undersized proven bottom 6 potential winger in Puustiten. Broz projects to be a top 9 two way C with 45-50 point potential and younger by a fair margin.Broz is not a center, he's another undersized winger.
Puustinen is a NHL proven undersized winger. Broz is a prospect that projects to be a NHL undersized winger.
Calling Jarry a cap dump while Blackwood is "a good goalie" is absolutely hilarious.
Jarry had barely better numbers than Blackwood on a such better team but is paid more for 4 more years . But no continue with your impartiality.Broz is not a center, he's another undersized winger.
Puustinen is a NHL proven undersized winger. Broz is a prospect that projects to be a NHL undersized winger.
Calling Jarry a cap dump while Blackwood is "a good goalie" is absolutely hilarious.
Jarry had barely better numbers than Blackwood on a such better team but is paid more for 4 more years . But no continue with your impartiality.
I'll correct myself, they dont want a severely undersized proven bottom 6 potential winger in Puustiten. Broz projects to be a top 9 two way C with 45-50 point potential and younger by a fair margin.
Hmmmm Gerbe or young Henrique? I think I'll go with the latter
Congrats? I’m talking about right now. Not 5 years ago. Ya know the timeline where Jarry had .04 better save percentage than Blackwood. One goalie had Ferraro and Rutta as their top 2 D. One had Karlsson and Letang. Hell let’s make it top 3! Vlasic and Pettersson.2019-2020: .921 save% in 33 games for Jarry, .915 save% in 47 games for Blackwood
2020-2021: .909 save% in 39 games for Jarry, .902 save% in 35 games for Blackwood
2021-2022: .919 save% in 58 games for Jarry, .892 save% in 25 games for Blackwood
2022-2023: .909 save% in 47 games for Jarry, .893 save% in 22 games for Blackwood
2023-2024: .903 save% in 51 games for Jarry, .899 save% in 44 games for Blackwood
Jarry has had better numbers in literally every single season in the last 5 years. And in 4 of those 5 seasons, he was playing for the Devils so you can't even use the "San Jose sucks" argument with it.
Again, Broz is literally not a center. He's a winger and does not project to be a "2-way center".
Aside from recently, he's nearly always been a center.2019-2020: .921 save% in 33 games for Jarry, .915 save% in 47 games for Blackwood
2020-2021: .909 save% in 39 games for Jarry, .902 save% in 35 games for Blackwood
2021-2022: .919 save% in 58 games for Jarry, .892 save% in 25 games for Blackwood
2022-2023: .909 save% in 47 games for Jarry, .893 save% in 22 games for Blackwood
2023-2024: .903 save% in 51 games for Jarry, .899 save% in 44 games for Blackwood
Jarry has had better numbers in literally every single season in the last 5 years. And in 4 of those 5 seasons, he was playing for the Devils so you can't even use the "San Jose sucks" argument with it.
Again, Broz is literally not a center. He's a winger and does not project to be a "2-way center".
Congrats? I’m talking about right now. Not 5 years ago.
The fact that you arguing semantics is laughable. Great call Jarry the same level goalie as Blackwood. He’s still a cap dump. Blackwood is not a cap dump just because of contract.Jarry still had a better season than Blackwood. Jarry's overall numbers are better while the two have identical GSAx on the year (+2.6 for Jarry, +2.5 for Blackwood).
The fact that the two had very similar seasons this year brings their value much closer. But their past performances show that calling Jarry a "cap dump" while Blackwood is "a good goalie" is laughable.
The fact that you arguing semantics is laughable. Great call Jarry the same level goalie as Blackwood. He’s still a cap dump. Blackwood is not a cap dump just because of contract.
But no continue to ignore contracts all you want.
Jarry is a cap dump. Blackwood is a good goalie. Again look at contracts.You called Blackwood a "good goalie" while Jarry was a "cap dump", despite Jarry's worst season being equal to Blackwood this year (who you again called "a good goalie") and every other season of Jarry's being clearly better.
It's not "arguing semantics", it's pointing out that you made a dumb argument.
The difference is Jarry is signed until he's 33 years old for over $5 million a year. He's absolutely a cap dump. Good luck getting anyone to take him without attaching picks.You called Blackwood a "good goalie" while Jarry was a "cap dump", despite Jarry's worst season being equal to Blackwood this year (who you again called "a good goalie") and every other season of Jarry's being clearly better.
It's not "arguing semantics", it's pointing out that you made a dumb argument.
Jarry is a cap dump. Blackwood is a good goalie. Again look ar contracts.
The difference is Jarry is signed until he's 33 years old for over $5 million a year. He's absolutely a cap dump. Good luck getting anyone to take him without attaching picks.
No but it sure as shit makes you look dumb since you can’t understand simple context.Just repeating it doesn't make it any less dumb.
Yeah picks to dump Jarry. Not to pay for Ferraro or Blackwood.We are attaching picks in the trade.
Yeah picks to dump Jarry. Not to pay for Ferraro or Blackwood.
No but it sure as shit makes you look dumb since you can’t understand simple context.
Neither Ferraro or Blackwood are “bad cap” and you thinking they are is crazy.I'm not sure Ferraro and Blackwood are anything but a swap of bad cap.
You're getting a 2nd and a decent prospect for PIT taking on Ferraro's contract.
You wanna swap out Blackwood for Vanecek since he has so much value? Feel free.
So if Blackwood was making 5M a year for the next 4 years he’d be positive value to you? Cause he sure wouldn’t be to me.The "context" you're providing is moronic. If Blackwood is a "good goalie", that by definition means Jarry is a "good goalie" because Jarry's numbers have been equal or better than Blackwood in every single season in the last 5 years.
If Jarry is a "good goalie" just like Blackwood is, how is Jarry a cap dump at a $5ish million salary? Cap dumps are bad players making too much money. Jarry is not a bad player using your own definition of calling Blackwood a "good goalie".
Either Blackwood isn't good and Jarry is a cap dump, which you can reasonably argue, or Blackwood is good while Jarry isn't a cap dump. Calling Blackwood good while Jarry is a cap dump has zero logical consistency to it
So if Blackwood was making 5M a year for the next 4 years he’d be positive value to you? Cause he sure wouldn’t be to me.
Oh no what will the Sharks do without clearing Ferraro and Blackwood's cap? We'll only have $35 million in cap space instead of $40 million.I'm not sure Ferraro and Blackwood are anything but a swap of bad cap.
You're getting a 2nd and a decent prospect for PIT taking on Ferraro's contract.
You wanna swap out Blackwood for Vanecek since he has so much value? Feel free.